I.R.C. § 141(a) Private Activity Bond —
For purposes of this title, the term “private activity
bond” means any bond issued as part of an issue—
I.R.C. § 141(a)(1) —
which meets—
I.R.C. § 141(a)(1)(A) —
the private business use test of paragraph (1) of subsection (b), and
I.R.C. § 141(a)(1)(B) —
the private security or payment test
of paragraph (2) of
subsection (b),
or
I.R.C. § 141(a)(2) —
which meets the private loan financing
test of subsection (c).
I.R.C. § 141(b) Private Business Tests
I.R.C. § 141(b)(1) Private Business Use Test —
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an
issue meets the test of this paragraph if more than 10 percent of
the proceeds of the issue are to be used for any private business
use.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(2) Private Security Or Payment Test —
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an
issue meets the test of this paragraph if the payment of the principal
of, or the interest on, more than 10 percent of the proceeds of such
issue is (under the terms of such issue or any underlying arrangement)
directly or indirectly—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(2)(A) —
secured by any interest in—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(2)(A)(i) —
property used or to be used for a private
business use, or
I.R.C. § 141(b)(2)(A)(ii) —
payments in respect of such property,
or
I.R.C. § 141(b)(2)(B) —
to be derived from payments (whether
or not to the issuer) in respect of property, or borrowed money,
used or to be used for a private business use.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3) 5 Percent Test For Private Business Use Not Related Or Disproportionate
To Government Use Financed By The Issue
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(A) In General —
An issue shall be treated as meeting the tests of paragraphs (1) and (2) if such tests would
be met if such paragraphs were applied—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(A)(i) —
by substituting “5 percent” for “10
percent” each place it appears, and
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(A)(ii) —
by taking into account only—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(A)(ii)(I) —
the proceeds of the issue which are
to be used for any private business use which is not related to any
government use of such proceeds,
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(A)(ii)(II) —
the disproportionate related business
use proceeds of the issue, and
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(A)(ii)(III) —
payments, property, and borrowed
money with respect to any use of proceeds described in subclause (I) or (II).
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(B) Disproportionate Related Business Use Proceeds —
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the disproportionate
related business use proceeds of an issue is an amount equal to the
aggregate of the excesses (determined under the following sentence)
for each private business use of the proceeds of an issue which is
related to a government use of such proceeds. The excess determined
under this sentence is the excess of—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(B)(i) —
the proceeds of the issue which are
to be used for the private business use, over
I.R.C. § 141(b)(3)(B)(ii) —
the proceeds of the issue which are
to be used for the government use to which such private business
use relates.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(4) Lower Limitation For Certain Output Facilities —
An issue 5 percent or more of the proceeds of which
are to be used with respect to any output facility (other than a
facility for the furnishing of water) shall be treated as meeting
the tests of paragraphs (1) and (2) if the nonqualified
amount with respect to such issue exceeds the excess of—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(4)(A) —
$15,000,000, over
I.R.C. § 141(b)(4)(B) —
the aggregate nonqualified amounts
with respect to all prior tax-exempt issues 5 percent or more of
the proceeds of which are or will be used with respect to such facility
(or any other facility which is part of the same project).
There shall not be taken into account under subparagraph
(B) any
bond which is not outstanding at the time of the later issue or which
is to be redeemed (other than in an advance refunding) from the net
proceeds of the later issue.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(5) Coordination With Volume Cap Where Nonqualified Amount Exceeds
$15,000,000 —
If the nonqualified amount with respect to an issue—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(5)(A) —
exceeds $15,000,000, but
I.R.C. § 141(b)(5)(B) —
does not exceed the amount which would
cause a bond which is part of such issue to be treated as a private
activity bond without regard to this paragraph,
such bond shall nonetheless be treated
as a private activity bond unless the issuer allocates a portion
of its volume cap under section 146 to
such issue in an amount equal to the excess of such nonqualified
amount over $15,000,000.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(6) Private Business Use Defined
I.R.C. § 141(b)(6)(A) In General —
For purposes of this subsection, the term “private
business use” means use (directly or indirectly) in a trade or business
carried on by any person other than a governmental unit. For purposes
of the preceding sentence, use as a member of the general public
shall not be taken into account.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(6)(B) Clarification Of Trade Or Business —
For purposes of the 1st sentence of subparagraph (A), any activity carried
on by a person other than a natural person shall be treated as a
trade or business.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(6)(C) Clarification Relating To Qualified Carbon Dioxide Capture Facilities —
For purposes of this subsection, the sale of carbon dioxide
produced by a qualified carbon dioxide capture facility (as defined
in section 142(o))
which is owned by a governmental unit shall not constitute private
business use.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(7) Government Use —
The term “government use” means any use other than
a private business use.
I.R.C. § 141(b)(8) Nonqualified Amount —
For purposes of this subsection, the term “nonqualified
amount” means, with respect to an issue, the lesser of—
I.R.C. § 141(b)(8)(A) —
the proceeds of such issue which are
to be used for any private business use, or
I.R.C. § 141(b)(8)(B) —
the proceeds of such issue with respect
to which there are payments (or property or borrowed money) described
in paragraph (2).
I.R.C. § 141(b)(9) Exception For Qualified 501(c)(3) Bonds —
There shall not be taken into account under this subsection
or subsection (c)
the portion of the proceeds of an issue which (if issued as a separate
issue) would be treated as a qualified 501(c)(3) bond if the issuer
elects to treat such portion as a qualified 501(c)(3) bond.
I.R.C. § 141(c) Private Loan Financing Test
I.R.C. § 141(c)(1) In General —
An issue meets the test of this subsection if the amount
of the proceeds of the issue which are to be used (directly or indirectly)
to make or finance loans (other than loans described in paragraph (2)) to persons other than
governmental units exceeds the lesser of—
I.R.C. § 141(c)(1)(A) —
5 percent of such proceeds, or
I.R.C. § 141(c)(1)(B) —
$5,000,000.
I.R.C. § 141(c)(2) Exception For Tax Assessment, Etc., Loans —
For purposes of paragraph (1), a loan is described
in this paragraph if such loan—
I.R.C. § 141(c)(2)(A) —
enables the borrower to finance any
governmental tax or assessment of general application for a specific
essential governmental function,
I.R.C. § 141(c)(2)(B) —
is a nonpurpose investment (within
the meaning of section 148(f)(6)(A)),
or
I.R.C. § 141(c)(2)(C) —
is a qualified natural gas supply contract
(as defined in section 148(b)(4)).
I.R.C. § 141(d) Certain Issues Used To Acquire Nongovernmental Output Property
Treated As Private Activity Bonds
I.R.C. § 141(d)(1) In General —
For purposes of this title, the term “private activity
bond” includes any bond issued as part of an issue if the amount
of the proceeds of the issue which are to be used (directly or indirectly)
for the acquisition by a governmental unit of nongovernmental output
property exceeds the lesser of—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(1)(A) —
5 percent of such proceeds, or
I.R.C. § 141(d)(1)(B) —
$5,000,000.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(2) Nongovernmental Output Property —
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, for
purposes of paragraph (1),
the term “nongovernmental output property” means any property (or
interest therein) which before such acquisition was used (or held
for use) by a person other than a governmental unit in connection
with an output facility (within the meaning of subsection (b)(4)) (other than a facility
for the furnishing of water). For purposes of the preceding sentence,
use (or the holding for use) before October 14, 1987, shall not be
taken into account.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3) Exception For Property Acquired To Provide Output To Certain
Areas —
For purposes of paragraph (1)—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(A) In General —
The term “nongovernmental output property” shall not
include any property which is to be used in connection with an output
facility 95 percent or more of the output of which will be consumed
in—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(A)(i) —
a qualified service area of the governmental
unit acquiring the property, or
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(A)(ii) —
a qualified annexed area of such unit.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(B) Definitions —
For purposes of subparagraph (A)—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(B)(i) Qualified Service Area —
The term “qualified service area” means, with respect
to the governmental unit acquiring the property, any area throughout
which such unit provided (at all times during the 10-year period
ending on the date such property is acquired by such unit) output
of the same type as the output to be provided by such property. For
purposes of the preceding sentence, the period before October 14,
1987, shall not be taken into account.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(B)(ii) Qualified Annexed Area —
The term “qualified annexed area” means, with respect
to the governmental unit acquiring the property, any area if—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(B)(ii)(I) —
such area is contiguous to, and annexed
for general governmental purposes into, a qualified service area
of such unit,
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(B)(ii)(II) —
output from such property is made
available to all members of the general public in the annexed area,
and
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(B)(ii)(III) —
the annexed area is not greater than
10 percent of such qualified service area.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(C) Limitation On Size Of Annexed Area Not To Apply Where Output
Capacity Does Not Increase By More Than 10 Percent —
Subclause (III) of subparagraph (B)(ii) shall not
apply to an annexation of an area by a governmental unit if the output
capacity of the property acquired in connection with the annexation,
when added to the output capacity of all other property which is
not treated as nongovernmental output property by reason of subparagraph (A)(ii) with respect
to such annexed area, does not exceed 10 percent of the output capacity
of the property providing output of the same type to the qualified
service area into which it is annexed.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(D) Rules For Determining Relative Size, Etc. —
For purposes of subparagraphs (B)(ii) and (C)—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(D)(i) —
The size of any qualified service area
and the output capacity of property serving such area shall be determined
as the close of the calendar year preceding the calendar year in
which the acquisition of nongovernmental output property or the annexation
occurs.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(3)(D)(ii) —
A qualified annexed area shall be
treated as part of the qualified service area into which it is annexed
for purposes of determining whether any other area annexed in a later
year is a qualified annexed area.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(4) Exception For Property Converted To Nonoutput Use —
For purposes of paragraph (1)—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(4)(A) In General —
The term “nongovernmental output property” shall not
include any property which is to be converted to a use not in connection
with an output facility.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(4)(B) Exception —
Subparagraph (A) shall
not apply to any property which is part of the output function of
a nuclear power facility.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(5) Special Rules —
In the case of a bond which is a private activity bond
solely by reason of this subsection—
I.R.C. § 141(d)(5)(A) —
subsections (c) and (d) of section 147 (relating to limitations on
acquisition of land and existing property) shall not apply, and
I.R.C. § 141(d)(5)(B) —
paragraph (8) of section 142(a) shall be applied as if
it did not contain “local”.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(6) Treatment Of Joint Action Agencies —
With respect to nongovernmental output property acquired
by a joint action agency the members of which are governmental units,
this subsection shall be applied at the member level by treating
each member as acquiring its proportionate share of such property.
I.R.C. § 141(d)(7) Exception For Qualified Electric And Natural Gas Supply Contracts —
The term “nongovernmental output property” shall not
include any contract for the prepayment of electricity or natural
gas which is not investment property under section 148(b)(2).
I.R.C. § 141(e) Qualified Bond —
For purposes of this part, the term “qualified bond"
means any private activity bond if—
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1) In General —
Such bond is—
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1)(A) —
an exempt facility bond,
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1)(B) —
a qualified mortgage bond,
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1)(C) —
a qualified veterans' mortgage bond,
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1)(D) —
a qualified small issue bond,
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1)(E) —
a qualified student loan bond,
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1)(F) —
a qualified redevelopment bond, or
I.R.C. § 141(e)(1)(G) —
a qualified 501(c)(3) bond.
I.R.C. § 141(e)(2) Volume Cap —
Such bond is issued as part of an issue which meets
the applicable requirements of section 146,
and
I.R.C. § 141(e)(3) Other Requirements —
Such bond meets the applicable requirements of each
subsection of section 147.
(Added by Pub. L. 99-514,
title XIII, Sec. 1301(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2603, and amended Pub. L. 100-203, title X, Sec.
10631(a), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330-453; Pub. L. 100-647, title I, Sec.
1013(a)(38), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3544; Pub. L. 109-58, title XIII, Sec.
1327(b),(c), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 594; Pub.
L. 117-58, Div. H, title IV, Sec. 80402(d), Nov. 15, 2021,
135 Stat. 429.)
BACKGROUND NOTES
Amendments to Part
1986—Pub. L. 99-514, title XIII, 1301(b),
Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2603, in amending part IV generally, substituted
“TAX EXEMPTION REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE AND LOCAL BONDS” for “DETERMINATION
OF MARITAL STATUS” as heading for part IV and added part analysis.
1986—Pub. L.
99-514, title XIII, 1301(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat.
2603, in amending part IV generally, added subpart heading and analysis
and struck out item 143 “Determination of marital status”.
1977—Pub. L. 95-30, title I, 101(e)(2),
May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 134, substituted “DETERMINATION OF MARITAL
STATUS” for “STANDARD DEDUCTION FOR INDIVIDUALS” as heading for part
IV.
1977—Pub. L. 95-30,
title I, 101(e)(2), May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 134, struck out items 141
“Standard deduction”, 142 “Individuals not eligible for standard deduction”,
144 “Election of standard deduction”, and 145 “Cross reference”.
AMENDMENTS
2021 — Subsec. (b)(6)(C). Pub. L. 117-58, Sec. 80402(d),
amended par. (6) by adding subpar. (C).
2005 — Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 109-58, Sec. 1327(b),
amended par. (2) by striking “or” at the end of subpar. (A); by substituting
“, or” for the period at the end of subpar. (B); and by adding subpar.
(C).
Subsec. (d)(7). Pub. L. 109-58, Sec. 1327(c),
added par. (7).
1988 — Subsec. (b)(5)(B). Pub. L. 100-647 substituted ‘cause
a bond’ for ‘cause bond’.
1987 — Subsecs. (d),
(e). Pub. L. 100-203 added
subsec. (d) and redesignated former subsec. (d) as (e).
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT
Amendments by Pub.
L. 117-58, Sec. 80402(d), effective for obligations issued
after December 31, 2021.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2005 AMENDMENTS
Amendments by Pub.
L. 109-58, Sec. 1327, effective for obligations issued
after the date of the enactment of this Act [Enacted: Aug. 8, 2005].
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1988 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub.
L. 100-647 effective, except as otherwise provided,
as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, to which such amendment
relates, see section 1019(a) of Pub.
L. 100-647, set out as a note under section 1 of
this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1987 AMENDMENT
Section 10631(c) of Pub.
L. 100-203 provided that:
‘(1) In general. — Except as otherwise provided
in this subsection, the amendments made by this section (amending
this section and sections 142 and 146 of this title) shall apply to
bonds issued after October 13, 1987 (other than bonds issued to refund
bonds issued on or before such date).
‘(2) Binding agreements. — The amendments
made by this section shall not apply to bonds (other than advance
refunding bonds) with respect to a facility acquired after October
13, 1987, pursuant to a binding contract entered into on or before
such date.
‘(3) Transitional rule. — The amendments
made by this section shall not apply to bonds issued —
‘(A) after October 13, 1987, by an authority created
by a statute —
‘(i) approved by the State Governor
on July 24, 1986, and
‘(ii) sections 1 through 10
of which became effective on January 15, 1987, and
‘(B) to provide facilities serving the area specified
in such statute on the date of its enactment.’
EFFECTIVE DATE; TRANSITIONAL RULES
Subtitle B (Sec. 1311-1318) of title XIII of Pub. L. 99-514, as amended by Pub. L. 100-647, title I, Sec. 1013(b),
(c)(1), (2)(A), (3)-(11)(D), (13), (14)(A), (d), (e)(1), (2)(A), (f)(1)(A),
(2)-(7)(A), (8), (9), (11), (g), (h), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3545-3550,
3558; Pub. L. 101-239,
title VII, Sec. 7831(e), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2427, provided that:
‘SEC. 1311. GENERAL EFFECTIVE DATES.
‘(a) In General. — Except as otherwise provided
in this subtitle, the amendments made by section 1301 (enacting sections
141 to 150 and 7703 of this title, amending sections 2, 22, 25, 32,
86, 103, 105, 152, 153, 163, 194, 269A, 414, 879, 1398, 3402, 4701,
4940, 4942, 4988, 6362, 6652, and 7871 of this title, repealing section
103A of this title, omitting former section 143 of this title, enacting
provisions set out as notes under sections 141 and 148 of this title,
and amending provisions set out as a note under section 103A of this
title) shall apply to bonds issued after August 15, 1986.
‘(b) Section 1301(f). —
‘(1) Increase in trade-in rate. —
The amendments made by paragraph (1) of section 1301(f) (amending
section 25 of this title) shall apply to nonissued bond amounts elected
after August 15, 1986.
‘(2) Certificates. — The
amendments made by paragraph (2) of section 1301(f) (amending section
25 of this title) shall apply to certificates issued with respect
to non-issued bond amounts elected after August 15, 1986.
‘(c) Changes in Use, Etc., of Facilities Financed
With Private Activity Bonds.— Subsection (b) of section 150
of the 1986 Code shall apply to changes in use (and ownership) after
August 15, 1986, but only with respect to financing (including refinancings)
provided after such date.
‘(d) Public Approval and Information Reporting. —
Sections 147(f) and 149(e) of the 1986 Code shall apply to bonds issued
after December 31, 1986.
‘(e) Rebate Requirement for Qualified Scholarship
Funding Bonds. — Section 150(d) of the 1986 Code shall apply
to payments made after August 15, 1986.
‘(f) Section 1303. — The amendments made
by section 1303 (amending sections 172, 1016, and 3402 of this title
and repealing sections 1391 to 1397 and 6039B of this title) shall
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act (Oct. 22, 1986).
‘SEC. 1312. TRANSITIONAL RULES FOR CONSTRUCTION
OR BINDING AGREEMENTS AND CERTAIN GOVERNMENT BONDS ISSUED AFTER AUGUST
15, 1986.
‘(a) Exception for Construction or Binding Agreements. —
‘(1) In general. —The
amendments made by section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a)
of this note) shall not apply to bonds (other than a refunding bond)
with respect to a facility
‘(A)(i) the original use of
which commences with the taxpayer, and the construction, reconstruction,
or rehabilitation of which began before September 26, 1985, and was
completed on or after such date,
‘(ii) the original use of which
begins with the taxpayer and with respect to which a binding contract
to incur significant expenditures for construction, reconstruction,
or rehabilitation was entered into before September 26, 1985, and
some of such expenditures are incurred on or after such date, or
‘(iii) acquired on or after
September 26, 1985, pursuant to a binding contract entered into before
such date, and
‘(B) described in an inducement
resolution or other comparable preliminary approval adopted by an
issuing authority (or by a voter referendum) before September 26,
1985.
‘(2) Significant expenditures. —
For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the term ‘significant expenditures’
means expenditures greater than 10 percent of the reasonably anticipated
cost of the construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of the
facility involved.
‘(b) Certain Amendments To Apply to Bonds Under
Subsection (a) Transitional Rule. —
‘(1) In general. — In
the case of a bond issued after August 15, 1986, and to which subsection
(a) of this section applies, the requirements of the following provisions
shall be treated as included in section 103 and section 103A (as appropriate)
of the 1954 Code:
‘(A) The requirement that 95
percent or more of the net proceeds of an issue are to be used for
a purpose described in section 103(b)(4) or (5) of such Code in order
for section 103(b)(4) or (5) of such Code to apply, including the
application of section 142(b)(2) of the 1986 Code (relating to limitation
on office space).
‘(B) The requirement that 95
percent or more of the net proceeds of an issue are to be used for
a purpose described in section 103(b)(6)(A) of the 1954 Code in order
for section 103(b)(6)(A) of such Code to apply.
‘(C) The requirements of section
143 of the 1986 Code (relating to qualified mortgage bonds and qualified
veterans’ mortgage bonds) in order for section 103A(b)(2) of the 1954
Code to apply.
‘(D) The requirements of section
144(a)(11) of the 1986 Code (relating to limitation on acquisition
of depreciable farm property) in order for section 103(b)(6)(A) of
the 1954 Code to apply.
‘(E) The requirements of section
147(b) of the 1986 Code (relating to maturity may not exceed 120 percent
of economic life).
‘(F) The requirements of section
147(f) of the 1986 Code (relating to public approval required for
private activity bonds).
‘(G) The requirements of section
147(g) of the 1986 Code (relating to restriction on issuance costs
financed by issue).
‘(H) The requirements of section
148 of the 1986 Code (relating to arbitrage).
‘(I) The requirements of section
149(e) of the 1986 Code (relating to information reporting).
‘(J) The provisions of section
150(b) of the 1986 Code (relating to changes in use).
‘(2) Certain requirements apply
only to bonds issued after december 31, 1986. — In the case
of subparagraphs (F) and (I) of paragraphs (1), paragraph (1) shall
be applied by substituting ‘December 31, 1986’ for ‘August 15, 1986’.
‘(3) Application of volume cap. —
Except as provided in section 1315, any bond to which this subsection
applies shall be treated as a private activity bond for purposes of
section 146 of the 1986 Code if such bond would have been taken into
account under section 103(n) or 103A(g) of the 1954 Code (determined
without regard to any carryforward election) were such bond issued
before August 16, 1986.
‘(4) Application of provisions.—
For purposes of applying the requirements referred to in any subparagraph
of paragraph (1) or of subsection (a)(3) or (b)(3) of section 1313
to any bond, such bond shall be treated as described in the subparagraph
of section 141(d)(1) of the 1986 Code to which the use of the proceeds
of such bond most closely relates.
‘(c) Special Rules for Certain Government Bonds
Issued After August 15, 1986. —
‘(1) In general. - In the case
of any bond described in paragraph (2) —
‘(A) section 1311(a) and (c)
and subsection (b) of this section shall be applied by substituting
‘August 31, 1986’ for ‘August 15, 1986’ each place it appears,
‘(B) subsection (b)(1) shall
be applied without regard to subparagraphs (F), (G), and (J), and
‘(C) such bond shall not be
treated as a private activity bond for purposes of applying the requirements
referred to in subparagraphs (H) and (I) of subsection (b)(1).
‘(2) Bond described. —
A bond is described in this paragraph if such bond is not —
‘(A) an industrial development
bond, as defined in section 103(b)(2) of the 1954 Code but determined —
‘(i) by inserting ‘directly
or indirectly’ after ‘is’ in the material preceding clause (i) of
subparagraph (B) thereof, and
‘(ii) without regard to subparagraph
(B) of section 103(b)(3) of such Code,
‘(B) a mortgage subsidy bond
(as defined in section 103A(b)(1) of such Code, without regard to
any exception from such definition), or
‘(C) a private loan bond (as
defined in section 103(o)(2)(A) of such Code, without regard to any
exception from such definition other than section 103(o)(2)(C) of
such Code).
‘(d) Election Out. — This section shall not
apply to any issue with respect to which the issuer elects not to
have this section apply.
‘SEC. 1313. TRANSITIONAL RULES RELATING TO REFUNDINGS.
‘(a) Certain Current Refundings. —
‘(1) In general. — Except
as provided in paragraph (3), the amendments made by section 1301
(for classification see section 1311(a) of this note) shall not apply
to any bond the proceeds of which are used exclusively to refund (other
than to advance refund) a qualified bond (or a bond which is part
of a series of refundings of a qualified bond) if —
‘(A) the amount of the refunding
bond does not exceed the outstanding amount of the refunded bond,
and
‘(B)(i) the average maturity
of the issue of which the refunding bond is a part does not exceed
120 percent of the average reasonably expected economic life of the
facilities being financed with the net proceeds of such issue (determined
under section 147(b) of the 1986 Code), or
‘(ii) the refunding bond has
a maturity date not later than the date which is 17 years after the
date on which the qualified bond was issued.
In the case of a qualified bond which was (when
issued) a qualified mortgage bond or a qualified veterans' mortgage
bond, subparagraph (B)(i) shall not apply and subparagraph (B)(ii)
shall be applied by substituting ‘32 years’ for ‘17 years’.
‘(2) Qualified bond. —
For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘qualified bond’ means any
bond (other than a refunding bond) - ‘(A) issued before August 16,
1986, or
‘(B) issued after August 15,
1986, if section 1312(a) applies to such bond.
‘(3) Certain amendments to apply. —
The following provisions of the 1986 Code shall be treated as included
in section 103 and section 103A (as appropriate) of the 1954 Code
and shall apply to refunding bonds described in paragraph (1):
‘(A) The requirements of section
147(f) (relating to public approval required for private activity
bonds) but only if the maturity date of the refunding bond is later
than the maturity date of the refunded bond.
‘(B) The requirements of section
147(g) (relating to restriction on issuance costs financed by issue).
‘(C) The requirements of sections
143(g) and 148 (relating to arbitrage).
‘(D) The requirements of section
149(e) (relating to information reporting).
‘(E) The provisions of section
150(b) (relating to changes in use).
Subparagraphs (A) and (D) shall apply only if the
refunding bond is issued after December 31, 1986. In the case of a
refunding bond described in paragraph (1) with respect to a qualified
bond described in paragraph (2)(B), the requirements of section 1312(b)(1)
which applied to such qualified bond shall be treated as specified
in this paragraph with respect to such refunding bond.
‘(4) Special rules for certain
government bonds issued after August 15, 1986. - In the case of any
bond described in section 1312(c)(2) -
‘(A) paragraph (2) of this subsection
shall be applied by substituting ‘August 31, 1986’ for ‘August 15,
1986’ and by substituting ‘September 1, 1986’ for ‘August 16, 1986’,
‘(B) paragraph (3) shall be
applied without regard to subparagraphs (A), (B), and (E), and
‘(C) such bond shall not be
treated as a private activity bond for purposes of applying the requirements
referred to in subparagraphs (C) and (D) of paragraph (3).
‘(b) Certain Advance Refundings. —
‘(1) In general. — Except
as provided in paragraph (3), the amendments made by section 1301
(for classification see section 1311(a) of this note) shall not apply
to any bond the proceeds of which are used exclusively to advance
refund a bond if —
‘(A) the refunded bond is described
in paragraph (2), and
‘(B) the requirements of subsection
(a)(1)(B) are met.
‘(2) Non-idb's, etc. —
A bond is described in this paragraph if such bond is not described
in subsection (b)(2) or (o)(2)(A) of section 103 of the 1954 Code
and was issued (or was issued to refund a bond issued) before August
16, 1986. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the determination
of whether a bond is described in such subsection (o)(2)(A) shall
be made without regard to any exception other than section 103(o)(2)(C)
of such Code.
‘(3) Certain amendments to apply. —
The following provisions of the 1986 Code shall be treated as included
in section 103 and section 103A (as appropriate) of the 1954 Code
and shall apply to refunding bonds described in paragraph (1):
‘(A) The requirements of section
147(f) (relating to public approval required for private activity
bonds).
‘(B) The requirements of section
147(g) (relating to restriction on issuance costs financed by issue).
‘(C) The requirements of section
148 (relating to arbitrage), except that section 148(d)(3) shall not
apply to proceeds of such bonds to be used to discharge the refunded
bonds.
‘(D) The requirements of paragraphs
(3) and (4) of section 149(d) (relating to advance refundings).
‘(E) The requirements of section
149(e) (relating to information reporting).
‘(F) The provisions of section
150(b) (relating to changes in use).
‘(G) Except as provided in the
last sentence of subsection (c)(2) of this section, the requirements
of section 145(b) (relating to $150,000,000 limitation on bonds other
than hospital bonds).
Subparagraphs (A) and (E) shall apply only if the
refunding bond is issued after December 31, 1986.
‘(4) Special rule for certain
government bonds issued after August 15, 1986. — In the case
of any bond described in section 1312(c)(2) -
‘(A) paragraph (2) of this subsection
shall be applied by substituting ‘September 1, 1986’ for ‘August 16,
1986’,
‘(B) paragraph (3) shall be
applied without regard to subparagraphs (A), (B), and (F), and
‘(C) such bond shall not be
treated as a private activity bond for purposes of applying the requirements
referred to in subparagraphs (C) and (E).
‘(5) Certain refunding bonds
subject to volume cap. — Any refunding bond described in paragraph
(1) the proceeds of which are used to refund a bond issued as part
of an issue 5 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are or
will be used to provide an output facility (within the meaning of
section 141(b)(4) of the 1986 Code) shall be treated as a private
activity bond for purposes of section 146 of the 1986 Code (to the
extent of the nongovernmental use of such issue, under rules similar
to the rules of section 146(m)(2) of such Code). For purposes of the
preceding sentence, use by a 501(c)(3) organization with respect to
its activities which do not constitute unrelated trades or businesses
(determined by applying section 513(a) of the 1986 Code) shall not
be taken into account.
‘(c) Treatment of Certain Refundings of Certain
IDB's and 501(c)(3) Bonds.—
‘(1) $40,000,000 limit for certain
small issue bonds. — Paragraph (10) of section 144(a) of the
1986 Code shall not apply to any bond (or series of bonds) the proceeds
of which are used exclusively to refund a tax-exempt bond to which
such paragraph and the corresponding provision of prior law did not
apply if —
‘(A) the average maturity date
of the issue of which the refunding bond is a part is not later than
the average maturity date of the bonds to be refunded by such issue,
‘(B) the amount of the refunding
bond does not exceed the outstanding amount of the refunded bond,
and
‘(C) the net proceeds of the
refunding bond are used to redeem the refunded bond not later than
90 days after the date of the issuance of the refunding bond.
For purposes of subparagraph (A), average maturity
shall be determined in accordance with section 147(b)(2)(A) of the
1986 Code.
‘(2) $150,000,000 limitation
for certain 501(c)(3) bonds. — Subsection (b) of section 145
of the 1986 Code (relating to $150,000,000 limitation for nonhospital
bonds) shall not apply to any bond (or series of bonds) the proceeds
of which are used exclusively to refund a tax-exempt bond to which
such subsection did not apply if —
‘(A)(i) the average maturity
of the issue of which the refunding bond is a part does not exceed
120 percent of the average reasonably expected economic life of the
facilities being financed with the net proceeds of such issue (determined
under section 147(b) of the 1986 Code), or
‘(ii) the refunding bond has
a maturity date not later than the later of the date which is 17 years
after the date on which the qualified bond (as defined in subsection
(a)(2)) was issued, and
‘(B) the requirements of subparagraphs
(B) and (C) of paragraph (1) are met with respect to the refunding
bond.
Subsection (b) of section 145 of the 1986 Code
shall not apply to the 1st advance refunding after March 14, 1986,
of a bond issued before January 1, 1986.
‘(3) Application to later issues. —Any
bond to which section 144(a)(10) or 145(b) of the 1986 Code does not
apply by reason of this section shall be taken into account in determining
whether such section applies to any later issue.
‘(d) Mortgage and Student Loan Targeting Rules
To Apply to Loans Made More Than 3 Years After the Date of the Original
Issue. — Subsections (a)(3) and (b)(3) shall be treated as including
the requirements of subsections (e) and (f) of section 143 and paragraphs
(3) and (4) of section 144(b) of the 1986 Code with respect to bonds
the proceeds of which are used to finance loans made more than 3 years
after the date of the issuance of the original bond.
‘SEC. 1314. SPECIAL RULES WHICH OVERRIDE OTHER
RULES IN THIS SUBTITLE.
‘(a) Arbitrage Restriction on Investments in Annuities. —
In the case of a bond issued after September 25, 1985, section 103(c)
of the 1954 Code shall be applied by treating the reference to securities
in paragraph (2) thereof as including a reference to an annuity contract.
The preceding sentence shall not apply to the first advance refunding
after September 25, 1985, if a bond issued before September 26, 1985.
‘(b) Temporary Period for Advance Refundings. —
In the case of a bond issued after December 31, 1985, to advance refund
a bond, the initial temporary period under section 103(c) of the 1954
Code with respect to the proceeds of the refunding bond shall end
not later than 30 days after the date of issue of the refunding bond.
‘(c) Determination of Yield. — In the case
of a bond issued after December 31, 1985, for purposes of section
103(c) of the 1954 Code, the yield on an issue shall be determined
on the basis of the issue price (within the meaning of sections 1273
and 1274 of the 1986 Code).
‘(d) Arbitrage Rebate Requirement. —
‘(1) In general. — Except
as otherwise provided in this subsection, in the case of a bond issued
after December 31, 1985, section 103 of the 1954 Code shall be treated
as including the requirements of section 148(f) of the 1986 Code in
order for section 103(a) of the 1954 Code to apply.
‘(2) Government bonds. —
In the case of a bond described in section 1312(c)(2) (and not described
in paragraph (3) of this subsection), paragraph (1) shall be applied
by substituting ‘August 31, 1986’ for ‘December 31, 1985’.
‘(3) Certain pools. —
‘(A) In general. — In
the case of a bond described in section 1312(c)(2) and issued as part
of an issue described in subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E), paragraph
(1) shall be applied by substituting ‘3 p.m. E.D.T., July 17, 1986’
for ‘December 31, 1985’. Such a bond shall not be treated as a private
activity bond for purposes of applying section 148(f) of the 1986
Code.
‘(B) Loans to unrelated governmental
units. — An issue is described in this subparagraph if any portion
of the proceeds of the issue is to be used to make or finance loans
to any governmental unit other than any governmental unit which is
subordinate to the issuer and the jurisdiction of which is within —
‘(i) the jurisdiction of the
issuer, or
‘(ii) the jurisdiction of the
governmental unit on behalf of which such issuer issued the issue.
‘(C) Less than 75 percent of
projects identified.— An issue is described in this subparagraph
if less than 75 percent of the proceeds of the issue is to be used
to make or finance loans to initial borrowers to finance projects
identified (with specificity) by the issuer, on or before the date
of issuance of the issue, as projects to be financed with the proceeds
of the issue.
‘(D) Less than 25 percent of
funds committed to be borrowed. — An issue is described in this
subparagraph if, on or before the date of issuance of the issue, commitments
have not been entered into by initial borrowers to borrow at least
25 percent of the proceeds of the issue.
‘(E) Certain long maturity issues. —
An issue is described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) the maturity date of any
bond issued as part of such issue exceeds 30 years, and
‘(ii) any principal payment
on any loan made or financed by the proceeds of the issue is to be
used to make or finance additional loans.
‘(F) Special rules. —
‘(i) Exception from subparagraphs
(c) and (d) where similar pools issued by issuer. — An issue
shall not be treated as described in subparagraph (C) or (D) with
respect to any issue to make or finance loans to governmental units
if —
‘(I) the issuer, before 1986,
issued 1 or more similar issues to make or finance loans to governmental
units, and
‘(II) the aggregate face amount
of such issues issued during 1986 does not exceed 250 percent of the
average of the annual aggregate face amounts of such similar issues
issued during 1983, 1984, or 1985.
‘(ii) Determination of issuance. —
For purposes of subparagraph (A), an issue shall not be treated as
issued until —
‘(I) the bonds issued as part
of such issue are offered to the public (pursuant to final offering
materials), and
‘(II) at least 25 percent of such bonds is sold
to the public.
For purposes of the preceding sentence, the sale
of a bond to a securities firm, broker, or other person acting in
the capacity of an underwriter or wholesaler shall not be treated
as a sale to the public.
‘(e) Information Reporting. — In the case
of a bond issued after December 31, 1986, nothing in section 103(a)
of the 1986 Code or any other provision of law shall be construed
to provide an exemption from Federal income tax for interest on any
bond unless such bond satisfies the requirements of section 149(e)
of the 1986 Code. A bond described in section 1312(c)(2) shall not
be treated as a private activity bond for purposes of applying such
requirements.
‘(f) Abusive Transaction Limitation on Advance
Refundings To Apply. — In the case of a bond issued after August
31, 1986, nothing in section 103(a) of the 1986 Code or any other
provision of law shall be construed to provide an exemption from Federal
income tax for interest on any bond if the issue of which such bond
is a part is described in paragraph (4) of section 149(d) of the 1986
Code (relating to abusive transactions).
‘(g) Termination of Mortgage Bond Policy Statement
Requirement. — Paragraph (5) of section 103A(j) of the 1954
Code (relating to policy statement) shall not apply to any bond issued
after August 15, 1986, and shall not apply to nonissued bond amounts
elected under section 25 of the 1986 Code after such date.
‘(h) Arbitrage Restriction on Investments in Investment-Type
Property. — In the case of a bond issued before August 16, 1986
(September 1, 1986 in the case of a bond described in section 1312(c)(2)),
section 103(c) of the 1954 Code shall be applied by treating the reference
to securities in paragraph (2) thereof as including a reference to
investment-type property but only for purposes of determining whether
any bond issued after October 16, 1987, to advance refund such bond
(or a bond which is part of a series of refundings of such bond) is
an arbitrage bond (within the meaning of section 148(a) of the 1986
Code).
‘(i) Section To Override Other Rules. — Except
as otherwise expressly provided by reference to a provision to which
a subsection of this section applies, nothing in any other section
of this subtitle shall be construed as exempting any bond from the
application of such provision.
‘SEC. 1315. TRANSITIONAL RULES RELATING TO VOLUME
CAP.
‘(a) In General. — Except as otherwise provided
in this section, section 146(f) of the 1986 Code shall not apply with
respect to an issuing authority's volume cap under section 103(n)
of the 1954 Code, and no carryforward under such section 103(n) shall
be recognized for bonds issued after August 15, 1986.
‘(b) Certain Bonds for Carryforward Projects Outside
of Volume Cap. — Bonds issued pursuant to an election under
section 103(n)(10) of the 1954 Code (relating to elective carryforward
of unused limitation for specified project) made before November 1,
1985, shall not be taken into account under section 146 of the 1986
Code if the carryforward project is a facility to which the amendments
made by section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this
note) do not apply by reason of section 1312(a) of this Act.
‘(c) Volume Cap Not To Apply With Respect to Certain
Facilities and Purposes. — Section 146 of the 1986 Code shall
not apply to any bond issued with respect to any facility or purpose
described in a paragraph of subsection (d) if —
‘(1) such bond would not have
been taken into account under section 103(n) of the 1954 Code for
calendar year 1986 (determined without regard to any carryforward
election) were such bond issued on August 15, 1986, or
‘(2) such bond would not have
been taken into account under section 103(n) of the 1954 Code for
calendar year 1986 (determined with regard to any carryforward election
made before January 1, 1986) were such bond issued on August 15, 1986.
The preceding sentence shall not apply to the extent
section 1313(b)(5) treats any bond as a private activity bond for
purposes of section 146 of the 1986 Code.
‘(d) Facilities and Purposes Described. —
‘(1) A facility is described
in this paragraph if the amendments made by section 201 of this Act
(amending sections 46, 167, 168, 178, 179, 280F, 291, 312, 465, 467,
514, 751, 1245, 4162, 6111, and 7701 of this title) (relating to depreciation)
do not apply to such facility by reason of section 204(a)(8) of this
Act (set out as a note under section 168 of this title) (or, in the
case of a facility which is governmentally owned, would not apply
to such facility were it owned by a nongovernmental person).
‘(2) A facility or purpose is
described in this paragraph if the facility or purpose is described
in a paragraph of section 1317.
‘(3) A facility is described in this paragraph
if the facility
‘(A) serves Los Osos, California, and
‘(B) would be described in paragraph
(1) were it a solid waste disposal facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $35,000,000.
‘(4) A facility is described
in this paragraph if it is a sewage disposal facility with respect
to which —
‘(A) on September 13, 1985,
the State public facilities authority took official action authorizing
the issuance of bonds for such facility, and
‘(B) on December 30, 1985, there
was an executive order of the State Governor granting allocation of
the State ceiling under section 103(n) of the 1954 Code in the amount
of $250,000,000 to the Industrial Development Board of the Parish
of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $98,500,000.
‘(5) A facility is described in this paragraph
if —
‘(A) such facility is a solid
waste disposal facility in Charleston, South Carolina, and
‘(B) a State political subdivision
took formal action on April 1, 1980, to commit development funds for
such facility.
For purposes of determining whether a bond issued
as part of an issue for a facility described in the preceding sentence
is an exempt facility bond for purposes of part IV of subchapter B
of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code, ‘90 percent’ shall be substituted for
‘95 percent’ in section 142(a) of the 1986 Code.
‘The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $75,000,000.
‘(6) A facility is described in this paragraph
if —
‘(A) such facility is a wastewater
treatment facility for which site preparation commenced before September
1985, and
‘(B) a parish council approved
a service agreement with respect to such facility on December 4, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $120,000,000.
‘(e) Treatment of Redevelopment Bonds. - Any bond
to which section 1317(6) of this Act applies shall be treated for
purposes of this section as described in subsection (c)(1). The preceding
sentence shall not apply to any bond which (if issued on August 15,
1986) would have been an industrial development bond (as defined in
section 103(b)(2) of the 1954 Code).
‘SEC. 1316. PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN ESTABLISHED
STATE PROGRAMS.
‘(a) Certain Loans to Veterans for the Purchase
of Land. —
‘(1) In general. — A bond
described in paragraph (2) shall be treated as described in section
141(d)(1) of the 1986 Code and as having a carryforward purpose described
in section 146(f)(5) of such Code, but subsections (a), (b), (c),
and (d) of section 147 of such Code shall not apply to such bond.
‘(2) Bond described. — A bond is described
in this paragraph if
‘(A) such bond is a private
activity bond solely by reason of section 141(c) of such Code, and
‘(B) such bond is issued as
part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are
to be used to carry out a program established under State law to provide
loans to veterans for the purchase of land and which has been in effect
in substantially the same form during the 30-year period ending on
July 18, 1984, but only if such proceeds are used to make loans or
to fund similar obligations —
‘(i) in the same manner in which,
‘(ii) in the same (or lesser)
amount or multiple of acres per participant, and
‘(iii) for the same purposes
for which, such program was operated on March 15, 1984.
‘(b) Renewable Energy Property. —
‘(1) In general. — A bond
described in paragraph (2) shall be treated as described in section
141(d)(1) of the 1986 Code and as having a carryforward purpose described
in section 146(f)(5) of such Code.
‘(2) Bond described. —
A bond is described in this paragraph if paragraph (1) of section
103(b) of the 1954 Code would not (without regard to the amendments
made by this title) have applied to such bond by reason of section
243 of the Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax Act of 1980 (section 243
of Pub. L. 96-223,
set out as a note under section 103 of this title) if —
‘(A) such section 243 were applied
by substituting ‘95 percent or more of the net proceeds’ for ‘substantially
all of the proceeds’ in subsection (a)(1) thereof, and
‘(B) subparagraph (E) of subsection
(a)(1) thereof referred to section 149(b) of the 1986 Code.
‘(c) Certain State Programs. —
‘(1) In general. — A bond
described in paragraph (2) shall be treated as described in section
141(d)(1) of the 1986 Code and as having a carryforward purpose described
in section 146(f)(5) of such Code.
‘(2) Bond described. —
A bond is described in this paragraph if such bond is issued as part
of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to
be used to carry out a program established under sections 280A, 280B,
and 280C of the Iowa Code, but only if —
‘(A) such program has been in
effect in substantially the same form since July 1, 1983, and
‘(B) such proceeds are to be
used to make loans or fund similar obligations for the same purposes
as permitted under such program on July 1, 1986.
‘(3) $100,000,000 limitation. —
The aggregate face amount of outstanding bonds to which this subsection
applies shall not exceed $100,000,000.
‘(4) Application of section
147(b). — A bond to which this subsection applies (other than
a refunding bond) shall be treated as meeting the requirements of
section 147(b) of the 1986 Code if the average maturity (determined
in accordance with section 147(b)(2)(A) of such Code) of the issue
of which such bond is a part does not exceed 20 years. A bond issued
to refund (or which is part of a series of bonds issued to refund)
a bond described in the preceding sentence shall be treated as meeting
the requirements of such section if the refunding bond has a maturity
date not later than the date which is 20 years after the date on which
the original bond was issued.
‘(d) Use by Certain Federal Instrumentalities Treated
as Use by Governmental Units. — Use by an instrumentality of
the United States shall be treated as use by a State or local governmental
unit for purposes of section 103, and part IV of subchapter B of chapter
1, of the 1986 Code with respect to a program approved by Congress
before August 3, 1972, but only if —
‘(1) a portion of such program
has been financed by bonds issued before such date, to which section
103(a) of the 1954 Code applied pursuant to a ruling issued by the
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, and
‘(2) construction of 1 or more
facilities comprising a part of such program commenced before such
date.
‘(e) Refunding Permitted of Certain Bonds Invested
in Federally Insured Deposits. —
‘(1) In general. — Section
149(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the 1986 Code (and section 103(h)(2)(B)(ii) of
the 1954 Code) shall not apply to any bond issued to refund a bond —
‘(A) which, when issued, would
have been treated as federally guaranteed by reason of being described
in clause (ii) of section 103(h)(2)(B) of the 1954 Code if such section
had applied to such bond, and
‘(B)(i) which was issued before April 15, 1983,
or
‘(ii) to which such clause did
not apply by reason of the except clause in section 631(c)(2) of the
Tax Reform Act of 1984 (section 631(c)(2) of Pub. L. 98-369, set out as a note
under section 103 of this title).
Section 147(c) of the 1986 Code (and section 103(b)(16)
of the 1954 Code) shall not apply to any refunding bond permitted
under the preceding sentence if section 103(b)(16) of the 1954 Code
did not apply to the refunded bond when issued.
‘(2) Requirements. — A
refunding bond meets the requirements of this paragraph if —
‘(A) the refunding bond has
a maturity date not later than the maturity date of the refunded bond,
‘(B) the amount of the refunding
bond does not exceed the outstanding amount of the refunded bond,
‘(C) the weighted average interest
rate on the refunding bond is lower than the weighted average interest
rate on the refunded bond, and
‘(D) the net proceeds of the
refunding bond are used to redeem the refunded bond not later than
90 days after the date of the issuance of the refunding bond.
‘(f) Certain Hydroelectric Generating Property. —
‘(1) In general. — A bond
described in paragraph (2) shall be treated as described in section
141(d)(1) of the 1986 Code and as having a carryforward purpose described
in section 146(f)(5) of such Code.
‘(2) Description. — A
bond is described in this paragraph if such bond is issued as part
of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to
be used to provide a facility described in section 103(b)(4)(H) of
the 1954 Code determined —
‘(A) by substituting ‘an application
for a license’ for ‘an application’ in section 103(b)(8)(E)(ii) of
the 1954 Code, and
‘(B) by applying the requirements
of section 142(b)(2) of the 1986 Code.
‘(g) Treatment of Bonds Subject to Transitional
Rules Under Tax Reform Act of 1984. —
‘(1) Subsections (d)(3) and
(f) of section 148 of the 1986 Code shall not apply to any bond described
in section 624(c)(2) of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (section 624(c)(2)
of Pub. L. 98-369,
set out as a note under section 103 of this title).
‘(2)(A) There shall not be taken
into account under section 146 of the 1986 Code any bond issued to
provide a facility described in paragraph (3) of section 631(a) of
the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (section 631(a)(3) of Pub. L. 98-369, set out as a note
under section 103 of this title) relating to exception for certain
bonds for a convention center and resource recovery project.
‘(B) If a bond issued as part
of an issue substantially all of the proceeds of which are used to
provide the convention center to which such paragraph (3) applies,
such bond shall be treated as an exempt facility bond as defined in
section 142(a) of the 1986 Code.
‘(C) If a bond which is issued
as part of an issue substantially all of the proceeds of which are
used to provide the resource recovery project to which such paragraph
(3) applies, such bond shall be treated as an exempt facility bond
as defined in section 142(a) of the 1986 Code and section 149(b) of
such Code shall not apply.
‘(3) The amendments made by
section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this note)
shall not apply to bonds issued to finance any property described
in section 631(d)(4) of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (section 631(d)(4)
of Pub. L. 98-369,
set out as a note under section 103 of this title).
‘(4) The amendments made by
section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this note)
shall not apply to —
‘(A) any bond issued to finance
property described in section 631(d)(5) of the Tax Reform Act of 1984
(section 631(d)(5) of Pub. L. 98-369,
set out as a note under section 103 of this title),
‘(B) any bond described in paragraph
(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), or (7) of section 632(a), or section 632(b),
of such Act (Pub. L. 98-369,
div. A, title VI, Sec. 632, July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 937), and
‘(C) any bond to which section 632(g)(2) of such
Act applies.
In the case of bonds to which this paragraph applies,
the requirements of sections 148 and 149(d) shall be treated as included
in section 103 of the 1954 Code and shall apply to such bonds.
‘(5) The preceding provisions
of this subsection shall not apply to any bond issued after December
31, 1988.
‘(6) The amendments made by
section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this note)
(and the provisions of section 1314) shall not apply to any bond issued
to finance property described in section 216(b)(3) of the Tax Equity
and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (section 216(b)(3) of Pub. L. 97-248, set out as a note
under section 168 of this title).
‘(7) In the case of a bond described
in section 632(d) of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-369, div. A, title VI,
Sec. 632(d), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 938) —
‘(A) section 141 of the 1986
Code shall be applied without regard to subsection (a)(2) and paragraphs
(4) and (5) of subsection (b),
‘(B) paragraphs (1) and (2)
of section 141(b) of the 1986 Code shall be applied by substituting
‘25 percent’ for ‘10 percent’ each place it appears, and
‘(C) section 149(b) of the 1986 Code shall not
apply.
This paragraph shall not apply to any bond issued
after December 31, 1990.
‘(8)(A) The amendments made
by section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this note)
shall not apply to any bond to which section 629(a)(1) of the Tax
Reform Act of 1984 (section 629(a)(1) of Pub.
L. 98-369, set out as a note under section 103 of
this title) applies, but such bond shall be treated as a private activity
bond for purposes of section 146 of the 1986 Code and as having a
carryforward purpose described in section 146(f)(5) of such Code.
‘(B) Section 629 of the Tax
Reform Act of 1984 (section 629 of Pub.
L. 98-369, set out as a note under section 103 of
this title) is amended —
‘(i) in subsection (c)(2), by
striking out ‘$625,000,000’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘$911,000,000’,
‘(ii) in subsection (c)(3),
by adding at the end thereof the following new subparagraphs:
‘ ‘(D) Improvements to existing
generating facilities.
‘ ‘(E) Transmission lines.
‘ ‘(F) Electric generating facilities.’,
and
‘(iii) in subsection (a), by
adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: ‘The preceding
sentence shall be applied by inserting ‘and a rural electric cooperative
utility’ after ‘regulated public utility’ but only if not more than
1 percent of the load of the public power authority is sold to such
rural electric cooperative utility.'
‘(h) Certain Pollution Bonds. — Any bond
which is treated as described in section 103(b)(4)(F) of the 1954
Code by reason of section 13209 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Pub. L.
99-272, title XIII, Sec. 13209, Apr. 7, 1986, 100
Stat. 322) shall be treated as an exempt facility bond for purposes
of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code, and section
147(d) of the 1986 Code shall not apply to such bond.
‘(i) Transition Rule for Aggregate Limit per Taxpayer. —
For purposes of section 144(a)(10) of the 1986 Code, tax increment
bonds described in section 1869(c)(3) of this Act (set out as a note
under section 103 of this title) which are issued before August 16,
1986, shall not be taken into account under subparagraph (B)(ii) thereof.
‘(j) Extension of Advance Refunding Exception for
Qualified Public Facility. — Paragraph (4) of section 631(c)
of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (section 631(c)(4) of Pub. L. 98-369, set out as a note
under section 103 of this title) is amended —
‘(1) by striking out ‘or the
Dade County, Florida, airport’ in the last sentence, and
‘(2) by adding at the end thereof
the following new sentence: ‘In the case of refunding obligations
not to exceed $100,000,000 issued after October 21, 1986, by Dade
County, Florida, for the purpose of advance refunding its Aviation
Revenue Bonds (Series J), the first sentence of this paragraph shall
be applied by substituting ‘the date which is 1 year after the date
of the enactment of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of
1988’ (Nov. 10, 1988) for ‘December 31, 1984’ and the amendments made
by section 1301 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 shall not apply.'
‘(k) Expansion of Exception for River Place Project. —
Section 1104 of the Mortgage Subsidy Bond Tax Act of 1980 (section
1104 of Pub. L. 96-499,
formerly set out as a note under section 103A of this title), as added
by the Tax Reform Act of 1984, is amended —
‘(1) by striking out ‘December
31, 1984,’ in subsection (p) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘December
31, 1984 (other than obligations described in subsection (r)(1)),’,
and
‘(2) by striking out ‘$55,000,000,’
in subsection (r)(1)(B) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘$110,000,000
of which no more than $55,000,000 shall be outstanding later than
November 1, 1987’.
‘SEC. 1317. TRANSITIONAL RULES FOR SPECIFIC
FACILITIES.
‘(1) Docks and wharves. — A bond issued as
part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are
to be used to provide any dock or wharf (within the meaning of section
103(b)(4)(D) of the 1954 Code) shall be treated as an exempt facility
bond (for a facility described in section 142(a)(2) of the 1986 Code)
for purposes of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code
if such dock or wharf is described in any of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A dock or wharf is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the issue to finance such
dock or wharf was approved by official city action on September 3,
1985, and by voters on November 5, 1985, and
‘(ii) such dock or wharf is
for a slack water harbor with respect to which a Corps of Engineers
grant of approximately $2,000,000 has been made under section 107
of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33
U.S.C. 577).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $2,500,000.
‘(B) A dock or wharf is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) inducement resolutions
were adopted on May 23, 1985, September 18, 1985, and September 24,
1985, for the issuance of the bonds to finance such dock or wharf,
‘(ii) a harbor dredging contract
with respect thereto was entered into on August 2, 1985, and
‘(iii) a construction management
and joint venture agreement with respect thereto was entered into
on October 1, 1984.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $625,000,000.
‘(C) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the legislature first authorized
on June 29, 1981, the State agency issuing the bond to issue at least
$30,000,000 of bonds,
‘(ii) the developer of the facility
was selected on April 26, 1985, and
‘(iii) an inducement resolution
for the issuance of such issue was adopted on October 9, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $200,000,000.
‘(D) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) an inducement resolution
was adopted on October 17, 1985, for such issue, and
‘(ii) the city council for the
city in which the facility is to be located approved on July 30, 1985,
an application for an urban development action grant with respect
to such facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $36,500,000. A facility shall
be treated as described in this subparagraph if it would be so described
if ‘90 percent’ were substituted for ‘95 percent’ in the material
preceding subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.
‘(2) Pollution control facilities. — A bond
issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds
of which are to be used to provide air or water pollution control
facilities (within the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(F) of the 1954
Code) shall be treated as an exempt facility bond for purposes of
part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code if such facility
is described in any of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) inducement resolutions
with respect to such facility were adopted on September 23, 1974,
and on April 5, 1985,
‘(ii) a bond resolution for
such facility was adopted on September 6, 1985, and
‘(iii) the issuance of the bonds
to finance such facility was delayed by action of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (file number 70-7127).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $120,000,000.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) there was an inducement
resolution for such facility on November 19, 1985, and
‘(ii) design and engineering
studies for such facility were completed in March of 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $25,000,000.
‘(C) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) a resolution was adopted
by the county board of supervisors pertaining to an issuance of bonds
with respect to such facility on April 10, 1974, and
‘(ii) such facility was placed
in service on June 12, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $90,000,000. For purposes of
this subparagraph, a pollution control facility includes a sewage
or solid waste disposal facility (within the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(E)
of the 1954 Code).
‘(D) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the issuance of the bonds
for such facility was approved by a State agency on August 22, 1979,
and
‘(ii) the authority to issue
such bonds was scheduled to expire (under terms of the State approval)
on August 22, 1989.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $198,000,000.
‘(E) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is 1 of 4
such facilities in 4 States with respect to which the Ball Corporation
transmitted a letter of intent to purchase such facilities on February
26, 1986, and
‘(ii) inducement resolutions
were issued on December 30, 1985, January 15, 1986, January 22, 1986,
and March 17, 1986 with respect to bond issuance in the 4 respective
States.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $6,000,000.
‘(F) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) inducement resolutions
for bonds with respect to such facility were adopted on September
27, 1977, May 27, 1980, and October 8, 1981, and
‘(ii) such facility is located
at a geothermal power complex owned and operated by a single investor-owned
utility.
For purposes of this subparagraph and section 103
of the 1986 Code, all hydrogen sulfide air and water pollution control
equipment, together with functionally related and subordinate equipment
and structures, located or to be located at such power complex shall
be treated as a single pollution control facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $600,000,000.
‘(G) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is an air
pollution control facility approved by a State bureau of pollution
control on July 10, 1986, and by a State board of economic development
on July 17, 1986, and
‘(ii) on August 15, 1986, the
State bond attorney gave notice to the clerk to initiate validation
proceedings with respect to such issue and on August 28, 1986, the
validation decree was entered.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $900,000.
‘(I) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) a private company met with
a State air control board on November 14, 1985, to propose construction
of a sulften unit, and
‘(ii) the sulften unit is being
constructed under a letter of intent to construct which was signed
on April 8, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $11,000,000.
‘(J) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is part of a 250 megawatt coal-fired electric plant in northeastern
Nevada on which the Sierra Pacific Power Company, a subsidiary of
Sierra Pacific Resources, began in 1980 work to design, finance, construct,
and operate. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $200,000,000.
‘(K) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) there was an inducement
resolution adopted by a State industrial development authority on
January 14, 1976, and
‘(ii) such facility is named
in a resolution of such authority relating to carryforward of the
State's unused 1985 private activity bond limit passed by such industrial
development authority on December 18, 1985.
This subparagraph shall apply only to obligations
issued at the request of the party pursuant to whose request the January
14, 1976, inducement was given. The aggregate face amount of bonds
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $75,000,000.
‘(L) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if a city council passed an ordinance (ordinance number 4626) agreeing
to issue bonds for such project, December 16, 1985. The aggregate
face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph applies shall
not exceed $45,000,000.
‘(3) Sports facilities. — A bond issued as
part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are
to be used to provide sports facilities (within the meaning of section
103(b)(4)(B) of the 1954 Code) shall be treated as an exempt facility
bond for purposes of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986
Code if such facilities are described in any of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is a stadium —
‘(i) which was the subject of
a city ordinance passed on September 23, 1985,
‘(ii) for which a loan of approximately
$4,000,000 for land acquisition was approved on October 28, 1985,
by the State Controlling Board, and
‘(iii) a stadium operating corporation
with respect to which was incorporated on March 20, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $200,000,000.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is a stadium with respect
to which a lease agreement for the ground on which the stadium is
to be built was entered into between a county and the stadium corporation
for such stadium on July 3, 1984,
‘(ii) there was a resolution
approved on November 14, 1984, by an industrial development authority
setting forth the terms under which the bonds to be issued to finance
such stadium would be issued, and
‘(iii) there was an agreement
for consultant and engineering services for such stadium entered into
on September 28, 1984.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $90,000,000.
‘(C) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is one or more stadiums
to be used either by an American League baseball team or a National
Football League team currently using a stadium in a city having a
population in excess of 2,500,000 and described in section 146(d)(3)
of the 1986 Code,
‘(ii) the bonds to be used to
provide financing for one or more such stadiums are issued by a political
subdivision or a State agency pursuant to a resolution approving an
inducement resolution adopted by a State agency on November 20, 1985,
as it may be amended (whether or not the beneficiaries of such issue
or issues are the beneficiaries (if any) specified in such inducement
resolution and whether or not the number of such stadiums and the
locations thereof are as specified in such inducement resolution)
or pursuant to P.A. 84-1470 of the State in which such city is located
(and by an agency created thereby), and
‘(iii) such stadium or stadiums
are located in the city described in (i).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $250,000,000. In the case of
any carryforward of volume cap for one or more stadiums described
in the first sentence of this subparagraph, such carryforward shall
be valid with respect to bonds issued for such stadiums notwithstanding
any other provision of the 1986 Code or the 1954 Code, and whether
or not (i) there is a change in the number of stadiums or the beneficiaries
or sites of the stadium or stadiums and (ii) the bonds are issued
by either of the state agencies described in the first sentence of
this subparagraph.
‘(D) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is a stadium
or sports arena for Memphis, Tennessee,
‘(ii) there was an inducement
resolution adopted on November 12, 1985, for the issuance of bonds
to expand or renovate an existing stadium and sports arena and/or
to construct a new arena, and
‘(iii) the city council for
such city adopted a resolution on April 19, 1983, to include funds
in the capital budget of the city for such facility or facilities.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $35,000,000.
‘(E) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility is a baseball stadium located in Bergen, Essex, Union,
Middlesex, or Hudson County, New Jersey with respect to which governmental
action occurred on November 7, 1985. The aggregate face amount of
bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $150,000,000.
‘(F) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is a facility with respect
to which —
‘(I) an inducement resolution
dated December 24, 1985, was adopted by the county industrial development
authority,
‘(II) a public hearing of the
county industrial development authority was held on February 6, 1986,
regarding such facility, and
‘(III) a contract was entered
into by the county, dated February 19, 1986, for engineering services
for a highway improvement in connection with such project, or
‘(ii) it is a domed football
stadium adjacent to Cervantes Convention Center in St. Louis, Missouri,
with respect to which a proposal to evaluate market demand, financial
operations, and economic impact was dated May 9, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $175,000,000.
‘(G) A project to provide a roof or dome for an
existing sports facility is described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) in December 1984 the county
sports complex authority filed a carryforward election under section
103(n) of the 1954 Code with respect to such project,
‘(ii) in January 1985, the State
authorized issuance of $30,000,000 in bonds in the next 3 years for
such project, and
‘(iii) an 11-member task force
was appointed by the county executive in June 1985, to further study
the feasibility of the project.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $30,000,000.
‘(H) A sports facility renovation or expansion
project is described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) an amendment to the sports
team's lease agreement for such facility was entered into on May 23,
1985, and
‘(ii) the lease agreement had
previously been amended in January 1976, on July 6, 1984, on April
1, 1985, and on May 7, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $20,000,000.
‘(I) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) an appraisal for such facility
was completed on March 6, 1985,
‘(ii) an inducement resolution
was adopted with respect to such facility on June 7, 1985, and
‘(iii) a State bond commission
granted preliminary approval for such project on September 3, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $3,200,000.
‘(J) A sports facility renovation
or expansion project is described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such facility is a domed
stadium which commenced operations in 1965,
‘(ii) such facility has been
the subject of an ongoing construction, expansion, or renovation program
of planned improvements,
‘(iii) part 1 of such improvements
began in 1982 with a preliminary renovation program financed by tax-exempt
bonds,
‘(iv) part 2 of such program
was previously scheduled for a bond election on February 25, 1986,
pursuant to a Commissioners Court Order of November 5, 1985, and
‘(v) the bond election for improvements
to such facility was subsequently postponed on December 10, 1985,
in order to provide for more comprehensive construction planning.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(K) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the 1985 State legislature
appropriated a maximum sum of $22,500,000 to the State urban development
corporation to be made available for such project, and
‘(ii) a development and operation
agreement was entered into among such corporation, the city, the State
budget director, and the county industrial development agency, as
of March 1, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $28,000,000.
‘(L) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is to consist of 1 or
2 stadiums appropriate for football games and baseball games with
related structures and facilities,
‘(ii) governmental action was
taken on August 7, 1985, by the county commission, and on December
19, 1985, by the city council, concerning such facility, and
‘(iii) such facility is located
in a city having a National League baseball team.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $200,000,000.
‘(M) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility consists
of 1 or 2 stadium projects (1 of which may be a stadium renovation
or expansion project) with related structures and facilities,
‘(ii) a special advisory commission
commissioned a study by a national accounting firm with respect to
a project for such facility, which study was released in September
1985, and recommended construction of either a new multipurpose or
a new baseball-only stadium,
‘(iii) a nationally recognized
design and architectural firm released a feasibility study with respect
to such project in April 1985, and
‘(iv) the metropolitan area
in which the facility is located is presently the home of an American
League baseball team.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $200,000,000.
‘(N) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is to consist of 1 or
2 stadiums appropriate for football games and baseball games with
related structures and facilities,
‘(ii) the site for such facility
was approved by the council of the city in which such facility is
to be located on July 9, 1985, and
‘(iii) the request for proposals
process was authorized by the council of the city in which such facility
is to be located on November 5, 1985, and such requests were distributed
to potential developers on November 15, 1985, with responses due by
February 14, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $200,000,000.
‘(O) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is described
in a feasibility study dated September 1985, and
‘(ii) resolutions were adopted
or other actions taken on February 21, 1985, July 18, 1985, August
8, 1985, October 17, 1985, and November 7, 1985, by the Board of Supervisors
of the county in which such facility will be located with respect
to such feasibility study, appropriations to obtain land for such
facility, and approving the location of such facility in the county.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $20,000,000.
‘(P) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility constructed on a site acquired with the sale of revenue
bonds authorized by a city council on December 2, 1985, (Ordinances
No. 669 and 670, series 1985). The aggregate face amount of bonds
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $90,000,000.
‘(Q) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) resolutions were adopted
approving a ground lease dated June 27, 1983, by a sports authority
(created by a State legislature) with respect to the land on which
the facility will be erected,
‘(ii) such facility is described
in a market study dated June 13, 1983, and
‘(iii) such facility was the
subject of an Act of the State legislature which was signed on July
1, 1983.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $81,000,000.
‘(R) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility is a baseball stadium and adjacent parking facilities
with respect to which a city made a carryforward election of $52,514,000
on February 25, 1985. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $50,000,000.
‘(S) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is to be
used by both a National Hockey League team and a National Basketball
Association team,
‘(ii) such facility is to be
constructed on a platform using air rights over land acquired by a
State authority and identified as site B in a report dated May 30,
1984, prepared for a State urban development corporation, and
‘(iii) such facility is eligible
for real property tax (and power and energy) benefits pursuant to
State legislation approved and effective as of July 7, 1982.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $225,000,000.
‘(T) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) a resolution authorizing
the financing of the facility through an issuance of revenue bonds
was adopted by the City Commission on August 5, 1986, and
‘(ii) the metropolitan area
in which the facility is to be located is currently the spring training
home of an American league baseball team located during the regular
season in a city described in subparagraph (C).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(U) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is a football stadium located in Oakland, California, with respect
to which a design was completed by a nationally recognized architectural
firm for a stadium seating approximately 72,000, to be located on
property adjacent to an existing coliseum complex, or is a renovation
of an existing stadium located in Oakland, California, and used by
an American League baseball team. The aggregate face amount of bonds
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $100,000,000.
‘(V) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is a sports arena (and related parking facility) for Grand Rapids,
Michigan. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $80,000,000.
‘(W) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility is located adjacent to the Anacostia River in the
District of Columbia. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $25,000,000.
‘(X) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is a spectator sports facility for the City of San Antonio,
Texas. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $125,000,000.
‘(Y) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it will be part of, or adjacent to, an existing stadium which has
been owned and operated by a State university and if —
‘(i) the stadium was the subject
of a feasibility report by a certified public accounting firm which
is dated December 28, 1984, and
‘(ii) a report by an independent
research organization was prepared in December 1985 demonstrating
support among donors and season ticket holders for the addition of
a dome to the stadium.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $50,000,000.
‘(Z) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility was a redevelopment
project that was approved in concept by the city council sitting as
the redevelopment agency in October 1984, and
‘(ii) $20,000,000 in funds for
such facility was identified in a 5-year budget approved by the city
redevelopment agency on October 25, 1984.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $80,000,000.
‘(4) Residential rental property. — A bond
issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds
of which are to be used to finance a residential rental project within
the meaning of section 103(b)(4) of the 1954 Code shall be treated
as an exempt facility bond within the meaning of section 142(a)(7)
of the 1986 Code if the facility with respect to the bond is issued
satisfies all low-income occupancy requirements applicable to such
bonds before August 15, 1986, and the bonds are issued pursuant to —
‘(A) a contract to purchase
such property dated August 12, 1985;
‘(B) the county housing authority
approved the property and the financing thereof on September 24, 1985,
and
‘(C) there was an inducement
resolution adopted on October 10, 1985, by the county industrial development
authority.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $25,400,000.
‘(5) Airports. — A bond issued as a part
of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to
be used to provide an airport (within the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(D)
of the 1954 Code) shall be treated as an exempt facility bond (for
facilities described in section 142(a)(1) of the 1986 Code) for purposes
of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code if the facility
is described in any of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if such facility is a hotel at an airport facility
serving a city described in section 631(a)(3) of the Tax Reform Act
of 1984 (section 631(a)(3) of Pub.
L. 98-369, set out as a note under section 103 of
this title) (relating to certain bonds for a convention center and
resource recovery project). The aggregate face amount of bonds to
which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $40,000,000.
‘(B) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if such facility is the primary airport for a
city described in paragraph (3)(C). The aggregate face amount of bonds
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $500,000,000.
Section 148(d)(2) of the 1986 Code shall not apply to any issue to
which this subparagraph applies. A facility shall be described in
this subparagraph if it would be so described if ‘90 percent’ were
substituted for ‘95 percent’ in the material preceding subparagraph
(A).
‘(C) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if such facility is a hotel at Logan airport
and such hotel is located on land leased from a State authority under
a lease contemplating development of such hotel dated May 1, 1983,
or under an amendment, renewal, or extension of such a lease. The
aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies
shall not exceed $40,000,000.
‘(D) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if such facility is the airport for the County
of Sacramento, California.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $150,000,000.
‘(6) Redevelopment projects. — A bond issued
as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which
are to be used to finance redevelopment activities as part of a project
within a specific designated area shall be treated as a qualified
redevelopment bond for purposes of part IV of subchapter B of chapter
1 of the 1986 Code if such project is described in any of the following
subparagraphs:
‘(A) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it was the subject of a city ordinance numbered 82-115 and adopted
on December 2, 1982, or numbered 9590 and adopted on April 6, 1983.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies
shall not exceed $9,000,000.
‘(B) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is a redevelopment project for an area in a city described in
paragraph (3)(C) which was designated as commercially blighted on
November 14, 1975, by the city council and the redevelopment plan
for which will be approved by the city council before January 31,
1987. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $20,000,000.
‘(C) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is a redevelopment project for an area in a city described in
paragraph (3)(C) which was designated as commercially blighted on
March 28, 1979, by the city council and the redevelopment plan for
which was approved by the city council on June 20, 1984. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $100,000,000.
‘(D) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is any one of three redevelopment projects in areas in a city
described in paragraph (3)(C) designated as blighted by a city council
before January 31, 1987 and with respect to which the redevelopment
plan is approved by the city council before January 31, 1987. The
aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies
shall not exceed $20,000,000.
‘(E) A project is described in this subparagraph
if such project is for public improvements (including street reconstruction
and improvement of underground utilities) for Great Falls, Montana,
with respect to which engineering estimates are due on October 1,
1986. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $3,000,000.
‘(F) A project is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such project is located
in an area designated as blighted by the governing body of the city
on February 15, 1983 (Resolution No. 4573), and
‘(ii) such project is developed
pursuant to a redevelopment plan adopted by the governing body of
the city on March 1, 1983 (Ordinance No. 15073).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $5,000,000.
‘(G) A project is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such project is located
in an area designated by the governing body of the city in 1983,
‘(ii) such project is described
in a letter dated August 8, 1985, from the developer's legal counsel
to the development agency of the city, and
‘(iii) such project consists
primarily of retail facilities to be built by the developer named
in a resolution of the governing body of the city on August 30, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $75,000,000.
‘(H) A project is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such project is a project
for research and development facilities to be used primarily to benefit
a State university and related hospital, with respect to which an
urban renewal district was created by the city council effective October
11, 1985, and
‘(ii) such project was announced
by the university and the city in March 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $40,000,000.
‘(I) A project is described in this subparagraph
if such project is a downtown redevelopment project with respect to
which
‘(i) an urban development action
grant was made, but only if such grant was preliminarily approved
on November 3, 1983, and received final approval before June 1, 1984,
and
‘(ii) the issuer of bonds with
respect to such facility adopted a resolution indicating the issuer's
intent to adopt such redevelopment project on October 6, 1981, and
the issuer adopted an ordinance adopting such redevelopment project
on December 13, 1983.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(J) A project is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) with respect to such project
the city council adopted on December 16, 1985, an ordinance directing
the urban renewal authority to study blight and produce an urban renewal
plan,
‘(ii) the blight survey was
accepted and approved by the urban renewal authority on March 20,
1986, and
‘(iii) the city planning board
approved the urban renewal plan on May 7, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(K) A project is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the city redevelopment
agency approved resolutions authorizing issuance of land acquisition
and public improvements bonds with respect to such project on August
8, 1978,
‘(ii) such resolutions were
later amended in June 1979, and
‘(iii) the State Supreme Court
upheld a lower court decree validating the bonds on December 11, 1980.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $380,000,000.
‘(L) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is a mixed use redevelopment project either —
‘(i) in an area (known as the
Near South Development Area) with respect to which the planning department
of a city described in paragraph 3(C) promulgated a draft development
plan dated March 1986, and which was the subject of public hearings
held by a subcommittee of the plan commission of such city on May
28, 1986, and June 10, 1986, or
‘(ii) in an area located within
the boundaries of any 1 or more census tracts which are directly adjacent
to a river whose course runs through such city.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $75,000,000.
‘(M) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is a redevelopment project for an area in a city described in
paragraph 3(C) and such area —
‘(i) was the subject of a report
released in May 1986, prepared by the National Park Service, and
‘(ii) was the subject of a report
released January 1986, prepared by a task force appointed by the Mayor
of such city.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $75,000,000.
‘(N) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is a city-university redevelopment project approved by a city
ordinance No. 152-0-84 and the development plan for which was adopted
on January 28, 1985. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $23,760,000.
‘(O) A project is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) an inducement resolution
was passed on March 9, 1984, for issuance of bonds with respect to
such project,
‘(ii) such resolution was extended
by resolutions passed on August 14, 1984, April 2, 1985, August 13,
1985, and July 8, 1986,
‘(iii) an urban development
action grant was preliminarily approved for part or all of such project
on July 3, 1986, and
‘(iv) the project is located
in a district designated as the Peabody-Gayoso District.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $140,000,000.
‘(P) A project is described in this subparagraph
if the project is a 1-block area of a central business district containing
a YMCA building with respect to which —
‘(i) the city council adopted
a resolution expressing an intent to issue bonds for the project on
September 27, 1985,
‘(ii) the city council approved
project guidelines for the project on December 20, 1985, and
‘(iii) the city council by resolution
(adopted on July 30, 1986) directed completion of a development agreement.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $26,000,000.
‘(Q) A project is described in this subparagraph
if the project is a 2-block area of a central business district designated
as blocks E and F with respect to which —
‘(i) the city council adopted
guidelines and criteria and authorized a request for development proposals
on July 22, 1985,
‘(ii) the city council adopted
a resolution expressing an intent to issue bonds for the project on
September 27, 1985, and
‘(iii) the city issued requests
for development proposals on March 28, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $47,000,000.
‘(R) A project is described in this subparagraph
if the project is an urban renewal project covering approximately
5.9 acres of land in the Shaw area of the northwest section of the
District of Columbia and the 1st portion of such project was the subject
of a District of Columbia public hearing on June 2, 1986. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $10,000,000.
‘(S) A project is described in this subparagraph
if such project is a hotel, commercial, and residential project on
the east bank of the Grand River in Grand Rapids, Michigan, with respect
to which a developer was selected by the city in June 1985 and a planning
agreement was executed in August 1985. The aggregate face amount of
bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $39,000,000.
‘(T) A project is described in this subparagraph
if such project is the Wurzburg Block Redevelopment Project in Grand
Rapids, Michigan. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(U) A project is described in this subparagraph
if such project is consistent with an urban renewal plan adopted or
ordered prepared before August 28, 1986, by the city council of the
most populous city in a state which entered the Union on February
14, 1859. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $83,000,000.
‘(V) A project is described in this subparagraph
if such project is consistent with an urban renewal plan which was
adopted (or ordered prepared) before August 13, 1985, by an appropriate
jurisdiction of a state which entered the Union on February 14, 1859.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies
shall not exceed $135,000,000 and the limitation on the period during
which bonds under this section may be issued shall not apply to such
bonds.
‘(W) A project is described in this subparagraph
if such project is —
‘(i) a part of the Kenosha Downtown
Redevelopment project, and
‘(ii) located in an area bounded —
‘(I) on the east by the east
wall of the Army Corps of Engineers Confined Disposal Facility (extended),
‘(II) on the north by 48th Street
(extended),
‘(III) on the west by the present
Chicago & Northwestern Railroad tracks, and
‘(IV) on the south by the north
line of Eichelman Park (60th Street) (extended).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $105,000,000.
‘(X) A project is described in this subparagraph
if a redevelopment plan for such project was approved by the city
council of Bell Gardens, California, on June 12, 1979. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $10,000,000.
‘(Y) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed
as having the effect of exempting from tax interest on any bond issued
after June 10, 1987, if such interest would not have been exempt from
tax were such bond issued on August 15, 1986.
‘(Z) Any designated area with respect to which
a project is described in any subparagraph of this paragraph shall
be taken into account in applying section 144(c)(4)(C) of the 1986
Code in determining whether other areas (not so described) may be
designated.
‘(7) Convention centers. — A bond issued
as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which
are to be used to provide any convention or trade show facility (within
the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(C) of the 1954 Code) shall be treated
as an exempt facility bond for purposes of part IV of subchapter B
of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code if such facility is described in any
of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) a feasibility consultant
and a design consultant were hired on April 3, 1985, with respect
to such facility, and
‘(ii) a draft feasibility report
with respect to such facility was presented on November 3, 1985, to
the Mayor of the city in which such facility is to be located.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $190,000,000. For purposes of
this subparagraph, not more than $20,000,000 of bonds issued to advance
refund existing convention facility bonds sold on May 12, 1978, shall
be treated as bonds described in this subparagraph and section 149(d)(2)
of the 1986 Code shall not apply to bonds so treated.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) an application for a State
loan for such facility was approved by the city council on March 4,
1985, and
‘(ii) the city council of the
city in which such facility is to be located approved on March 25,
1985, an application for an urban development action grant.
The aggregate face amount of bonds which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(C) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) on November 1, 1983, a
convention development tax took effect and was dedicated to financing
such facility,
‘(ii) the State supreme court
of the State in which the facility is to be located validated such
tax on February 8, 1985, and
‘(iii) an agreement was entered
into on November 14, 1985, between the city and county in which such
facility is to be located on the terms of the bonds to be issued with
respect to such facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $66,000,000.
‘(D) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is a convention, trade,
or spectator facility,
‘(ii) a regional convention,
trade, and spectator facilities study committee was created before
March 19, 1985, with respect to such facility, and
‘(iii) feasibility and preliminary
design consultants were hired on May 1, 1985, and October 31, 1985,
with respect to such facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed the excess of $175,000,000 over
the amount of bonds to which paragraph (48)(B) applies.
‘(E) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is meeting
rooms for a convention center, and
‘(ii) resolutions and ordinances
were adopted with respect to such meeting rooms on January 17, 1983,
July 11, 1983, December 17, 1984, and September 23, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $75,000,000.
‘(F) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is an international trade center which is part of the 125th
Street redevelopment project in New York, New York. The aggregate
face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph applies shall
not exceed $165,000,000.
‘(G) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is located
in a city which was the subject of a convention center market analysis
or study dated March 1983, and prepared by a nationally recognized
accounting firm,
‘(ii) such facility's location
was approved in December 1985 by a task force created jointly by the
Governor of the State within which such facility will be located and
the mayor of the capital city of such State, and
‘(iii) the size of such facility
is not more than 200,000 square feet.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $70,000,000.
‘(H) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if an analysis of operations and recommendations of utilization of
such facility was prepared by a certified public accounting firm pursuant
to an engagement authorized on March 6, 1984, and presented on June
11, 1984, to officials of the city in which such facility is located.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies
shall not exceed $75,000,000.
‘(I) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) voters approved a bond
issue to finance the acquisition of the site for such facility on
May 4, 1985,
‘(ii) title of the property
was transferred from the Illinois Center Gulf Railroad to the city
on September 30, 1985, and
‘(iii) a United States judge
rendered a decision regarding the fair market value of the site of
such facility on December 30, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $131,000,000.
‘(J) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is to be
used for an annual aquafestival,
‘(ii) a referendum was held
on April 6, 1985, in which voters permitted the city council to lease
130 acres of dedicated parkland for the purpose of constructing such
facility, and
‘(iii) the city council passed
an inducement resolution on June 19, 1986. The aggregate face amount
of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(K) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) voters approved a bond
issued to finance a portion of the cost of such facility on December
1, 1984, and
‘(ii) such facility was the
subject of a market study and financial projections dated March 21,
1986, prepared by a nationally recognized accounting firm.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $5,000,000.
‘(L) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) on July 12, 1984, the city
council passed a resolution increasing the local hotel and motel tax
to 7 percent to assist in paying for such facility,
‘(ii) on October 25, 1984, the
city council selected a consulting firm for such facility, and
‘(iii) with respect to such
facility, the city council appropriated funds for additional work
on February 7, 1985, October 3, 1985, and June 26, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $120,000,000.
‘(M) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) a board of county commissioners,
in an action dated January 21, 1986, supported an application for
official approval of the facility, and
‘(ii) the State economic development
commission adopted a resolution dated February 25, 1986, determining
the facility to be an eligible facility pursuant to State law and
the rules adopted by the commission.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $7,500,000.
‘(8) Sports or convention facilities. — A
bond issued as a part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds
of which are to be used to provide either a sports facility (within
the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(B) of the 1954 Code) or a convention
facility (within the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(C) of the 1954 Code)
shall be treated as an exempt facility bond for purposes of part IV
of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code if such facility is
described in any of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A combined convention and arena facility,
or any part thereof (whether on the same or different sites), is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) bonds for the expansion,
acquisition, or construction of such combined facility are payable
from a tax and are issued under a plan initially approved by the voters
of the taxing authority on April 25, 1978, and
‘(ii) such bonds were authorized
for expanding a convention center, for acquiring an arena site, and
for building an arena or any of the foregoing pursuant to a resolution
adopted by the governing body of the bond issuer on March 17, 1986,
and superseded by a resolution adopted by such governing body on May
27, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $160,000,000.
‘(B) A sports or convention facility is described
in this subparagraph if -
‘(i) on March 4, 1986, county
commissioners held public hearings on creation of a county convention
facilities authority, and
‘(ii) on March 7, 1986, the
county commissioners voted to create a county convention facilities
authority and to submit to county voters a 1/2 cent sales and use
tax to finance such facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $150,000,000.
‘(C) A sports or convention facility is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) a feasibility consultant
and a design consultant were hired prior to October 1980 with respect
to such facility,
‘(ii) a feasibility report dated
October 1980 with respect to such facility was presented to a city
or county in which such facility is to be located, and
‘(iii) on September 7, 1982,
a joint city/county resolution appointed a committee which was charged
with the task of independently reviewing the studies and present need
for the facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(D) A sports or convention facility is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such facility is a multipurpose
coliseum facility for which, before January 1, 1985, a city, an auditorium
district created by the State legislature within which such facility
will be located, and a limited partnership executed an enforceable
contract,
‘(ii) significant governmental
action regarding such facility was taken before May 23, 1983, and
‘(iii) inducement resolutions
were passed for issuance of bonds with respect to such facility on
May 26, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $25,000,000.
‘(9) Parking facilities. — A bond issued
as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which
are to be used to provide a parking facility (within the meaning of
section 103(b)(4)(D) of the 1954 Code) shall be treated as an exempt
facility bond for purposes of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1
of the 1986 Code if such facility is described in any of the following
subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) there was an inducement
resolution on March 9, 1984, for the issuance of bonds with respect
to such facility, and
‘(ii) such resolution was extended
by resolutions passed on August 14, 1984, April 2, 1985, August 13,
1985, and July 8, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $30,000,000.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is for a
university medical school,
‘(ii) the last parcel of land
necessary for such facility was purchased on February 4, 1985, and
‘(iii) the amount of bonds to
be issued with respect to such facility was increased by the State
legislature of the State in which the facility is to be located as
part of its 1983-1984 general appropriations act.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $9,000,000.
‘(C) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the development agreement
with respect to the project of which such facility is a part was entered
into during May 1984, and
‘(ii) an inducement resolution
was passed on October 9, 1985, for the issuance of bonds with respect
to the facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $35,000,000.
‘(D) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if the city council approved a resolution of intent to issue tax-exempt
bonds (Resolution 34083) for such facility on April 30, 1986. The
aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies
shall not exceed $8,000,000. Solely for purposes of this subparagraph,
a heliport constructed as part of such facility shall be deemed to
be functionally related and subordinate to such facility.
‘(E) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) resolutions were adopted
by a public joint powers authority relating to such facility on March
6, 1985, May 1, 1985, October 2, 1985, December 4, 1985, and February
5, 1986; and
‘(ii) such facility is to be
located at an exposition park which includes a coliseum and sports
arena.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $150,000,000.
‘(F) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is to be constructed
as part of an overall development that is the subject of a development
agreement dated October 1, 1983, between a developer and an organization
described in section 501(c)(3) of the 1986 Code, and
‘(ii) an environmental notification
form with respect to the overall development was filed with a State
environmental agency on February 28, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(G) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) an inducement resolution
was passed by the city redevelopment agency on December 3, 1984, and
a resolution to carryforward the private activity bond limit was passed
by such agency on December 21, 1984, with respect to such facility,
and
‘(ii) the owner participation
agreement with respect to such facility was entered into on July 30,
1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $18,000,000.
‘(H) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) an application (dated August
28, 1986) for financial assistance was submitted to the county industrial
development agency with respect to such facility, and
‘(ii) the inducement resolution
for such facility was passed by the industrial development agency
on September 10, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $8,000,000.
‘(I) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is located in a city
the parking needs of which were comprehensively described in a ‘Downtown
Parking Plan’ dated January 1983, and approved by the city's City
Plan Commission on June 1, 1983, and
‘(ii) obligations with respect
to the construction of which are issued on behalf of a State or local
governmental unit by a corporation empowered to issue the same which
was created by the legislative body of a State by an Act introduced
on May 21, 1985, and thereafter passed, which Act became effective
without the governor's signature on June 26, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $50,000,000.
‘(J) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility is located
in a city which was the subject of a convention center market analysis
or study dated March 1983 and prepared by a nationally recognized
accounting firm,
‘(ii) such facility is intended
for use by, among others, persons attending a convention center located
within the same town or city, and
‘(iii) such facility's location
was approved in December 1985 by a task force created jointly by the
governor of the State within which such facility will be located and
the mayor of the capital city of such State.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $30,000,000.
‘(K) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) scale and components for
the facility were determined by a city downtown plan adopted October
31, 1984 (resolution number 3882), and
‘(ii) the site area for the
facility is approximately 51,200 square feet.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $5,000,000.
‘(L) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the property for such facility
was offered for development by a city renewal agency on March 19,
1986 (resolution number 920), and
‘(ii) the site area for the
facility is approximately 25,600 square feet.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $5,000,000.
‘(M) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if such facility was approved by official action
of the city council on July 26, 1984 (resolution number 33718), and
is for the Moyer Theatre. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $8,000,000.
‘(N) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if it is part of a renovation project involving
the Outlet Company building in Providence, Rhode Island. The aggregate
face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph applies shall
not exceed $6,000,000.
‘(10) Certain advance refundings. —
‘(A) Section 149(d)(3) of the
1986 Code shall not apply to a bond issued by a State admitted to
the Union on November 16, 1907, for the advance refunding of not more
than $186,000,000 State turnpike obligations.
‘(B) A refunding of the Charleston,
West Virginia Town Center Garage Bonds shall not be treated for purposes
of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code as an advance
refunding if it would not be so treated if ‘100’ were substituted
for ‘90’ in section 149(d)(5) of such Code.
‘(11) Principal user provisions. —
‘(A) In the case of a bond issued
as part of an issue the proceeds of which are to be used to provide
a facility described in subparagraph (B) or (C), the determination
of whether such bond is an exempt facility bond shall be made by substituting
‘90 percent’ for ‘95 percent’ in section 142(a) of the 1986 Code.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) it is a waste-to-energy
project for which a contract for the sale of electricity was executed
in September 1984, and
‘(ii) the design, construction,
and operation contract for such project was signed in March 1985 and
the order to begin construction was issued on March 31, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $29,100,000.
‘(C) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if it is described in section 1865(c)(2)(C) of
this Act (set out as a note under section 103 of this title).
‘(12) Qualified scholarship funding bonds. —
Subsections (d)(3) and (f) of section 148 of the 1986 Code shall not
apply to any bond or series of bonds the proceeds of which are used
exclusively to refund qualified scholarship funding bonds (as defined
in section 150 of the 1986 Code) issued before January 1, 1986, if —
‘(A) the amount of the refunding bonds does not
exceed the aggregate face amount of the refunded bonds,
‘(B) the maturity date of such refunding bond is
not later than later of —
‘(i) the maturity date of the
bond to be refunded, or
‘(ii) the date which is 15 years
after the date on which the refunded bond was issued (or, in the case
of a series of refundings, the date on which the original bond was
issued),
‘(C) the bonds to be refunded were issued by the
California Student Loan Finance Corporation, and
‘(D) the face amount of the refunding bonds does
not exceed $175,000,000.
‘(13) Residential rental property projects. —
A bond issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds
of which are to be used to provide a project for residential rental
property which satisfies the requirements of section 103(b)(4)(A)
of the 1954 Code shall be treated as an exempt facility bond (for
projects described in section 142(a)(7) of the 1986 Code) for purposes
of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code if the project
is described in any of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) a public building development
corporation was formed on June 6, 1984, with respect to such project,
‘(ii) a partnership of which
the corporation is a general partner was formed on June 8, 1984, and
‘(iii) the partnership entered
into a preliminary agreement with the State public facilities authority
effective as of May 4, 1984, with respect to the issuance of the bonds
for such project.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $6,200,000.
‘(B) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) the Board of Commissioners
of the city housing authority officially selected such project's developer
on December 19, 1985,
‘(ii) the Board of the City
Redevelopment Commission agreed on February 13, 1986, to conduct a
public hearing with respect to the project on March 6, 1986,
‘(iii) an official action resolution
for such project was adopted on March 6, 1986, and
‘(iv) an allocation of a portion
of the State ceiling was made with respect to such project on July
29, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(C) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) the issuance of $1,289,882
of bonds for such project was approved by a State agency on September
11, 1985, and
‘(ii) the authority to issue
such bonds was scheduled to expire (under the terms of the State approval)
on September 9, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $1,300,000.
‘(D) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) the issuance of $7,020,000
of bonds for such project was approved by a State agency on October
10, 1985, and
‘(ii) the authority to issue
such bonds was scheduled to expire (under the terms of the State approval)
on October 9, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $7,020,000.
‘(E) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) it is to be located in
a city urban renewal project area which was established pursuant to
an urban renewal plan adopted by the city council on May 17, 1960,
‘(ii) the urban renewal plan
was revised in 1972 to permit multifamily dwellings in areas of the
urban renewal project designated as a central business district,
‘(iii) an inducement resolution
was adopted for such project on December 14, 1984, and
‘(iv) the city council approved
on November 6, 1985, an agreement which provides for conveyance to
the city of fee title to such project site.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(F) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such project is to be located
in a city urban renewal project area which was established pursuant
to an urban renewal plan adopted by the city council on May 17, 1960,
‘(ii) the urban renewal plan
was revised in 1972 to permit multifamily dwellings in areas of the
urban renewal project designated as a central business district,
‘(iii) the amended urban renewal
plan adopted by the city council on May 19, 1972, also provides for
the conversion of any public area site in Block J of the urban renewal
project area for the development of residential facilities, and
‘(iv) acquisition of all of
the parcels comprising the Block J project site was completed by the
city on December 28, 1984.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(G) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such project is to be located
on a city-owned site which is to become available for residential
development upon the relocation of a bus maintenance facility,
‘(ii) preliminary design studies
for such project site were completed in December 1985, and
‘(iii) such project is located
in the same State as the projects described in subparagraphs (E) and
(F).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $100,000,000.
‘(H) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) at least 20 percent of
the residential units in such project are to be utilized to fulfill
the requirements of a unilateral agreement date July 21, 1983, relating
to the provision of low- and moderate-income housing,
‘(ii) the unilateral agreement
was incorporated into ordinance numbers 83-49 and 83-50, adopted by
the city council and approved by the mayor on August 24, 1983, and
‘(iii) an inducement resolution
was adopted for such project on September 25, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $8,000,000.
‘(I) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) a letter of understanding
was entered into on December 11, 1985, between the city and county
housing and community development office and the project developer
regarding the conveyance of land for such project, and
‘(ii) such project is located
in the same State as the projects described in subparagraphs (E),
(F), (G), and (H).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed an amount which, together with
the amounts allowed under subparagraphs (E), (F), (G), and (H), does
not exceed $250,000,000.
‘(J) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if it is a multifamily residential development
located in Arrowhead Springs, within the county of San Bernardino,
California, and a portion of the site of which currently is owned
by the Campus Crusade for Christ. The aggregate face amount of bonds
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $350,000,000.
‘(K) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) it is a new residential
development with approximately 309 dwelling units located in census
tract No. 3202, and
‘(ii) there was an inducement
ordinance for such project adopted by a city council on November 20,
1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $32,000,000.
‘(L) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) it is a new residential
development with approximately 70 dwelling units located in census
tract No. 3901, and
‘(ii) there was an inducement
ordinance for such project adopted by a city council on August 14,
1984.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $4,000,000.
‘(M) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) it is a new residential
development with approximately 98 dwelling units located in census
tract No. 4701, and
‘(ii) there was an inducement
ordinance for such project adopted by a city council on August 14,
1984.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $7,000,000.
‘(N) A project or projects are described in this
subparagraph if they are part of the Willow Road residential improvement
plan in Menlo Park, California. The aggregate face amount of obligations
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $9,000,000.
‘(O) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) an inducement resolution
for such project was approved on July 18, 1985, by the city council,
‘(ii) such project was approved
by such council on August 11, 1986, and
‘(iii) such project consists
of approximately 22 duplexes to be used for housing qualified low
and moderate income tenants.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $1,500,000.
‘(P) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if –
‘(i) an inducement resolution
for such project was approved on April 22, 1986, by the city council,
‘(ii) such project was approved
by such council on August 11, 1986, and
‘(iii) such project consists
of a unit apartment complex (having approximately 60 units) to be
used for housing qualified low and moderate income tenants.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $1,625,000.
‘(Q) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) a State housing authority
granted a notice of official action for the project on May 24, 1985,
and
‘(ii) a binding agreement was
executed for such project with the State housing finance authority
on May 14, 1986, and such agreement was accepted by the State housing
authority on June 5, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $7,800,000.
‘(R) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if such project is either of 2 projects (located
in St. Louis, Missouri) which received commitments to provide construction
and permanent financing through the issuance of bonds in principal
amounts of up to $242,130 and $654,045, on July 16, 1986. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $1,000,000.
‘(S) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) a local housing authority
approved an inducement resolution for such project on January 28,
1985, and
‘(ii) a suit relating to such
project was dismissed without right of further appeal on April 4,
1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $13,200,000.
‘(T) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such project is the renovation
of a hotel for residents for senior citizens,
‘(ii) an inducement resolution
for such project was adopted on November 20, 1985, by the State Development
Finance Authority, and
‘(iii) such project is to be
located in the metropolitan area of the city described in paragraph
(3)(C).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $9,500,000.
‘(U) A residential rental property project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such project is the renovation
of apartment housing,
‘(ii) an inducement resolution
for such project was adopted on December 20, 1985, by the State Housing
Development Authority, and
‘(iii) such project is to be
located in the metropolitan area of the city described in paragraph
(3)(C).
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $12,000,000.
‘(V) A residential rental project is described
in this subparagraph if it is a renovation and construction project
for low-income housing in central Louisville, Kentucky, and local
board approval for such project was granted April 22, 1986. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $500,000.
‘(W) A residential rental project is described
in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such project is 1 of 6
residential rental projects having in the aggregate approximately
1,010 units,
‘(ii) inducement resolutions
for such projects were adopted by the county residential finance authority
on November 21, 1985, and
‘(iii) a public hearing of the
county residential finance authority was held by such authority on
December 19, 1985, regarding such projects to be constructed by an
in-commonwealth developer.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $62,000,000.
‘(X) A residential rental project is described
in this subparagraph if -
‘(i) an inducement resolution
with respect to such project was adopted by the State housing development
authority on January 25, 1985, and
‘(ii) the issuance of bonds
for such project was the subject of a law suit filed on October 25,
1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $64,000,000.
‘(Y) A project or projects are described in this
subparagraph if they are financed with bonds issued by the Tulare,
California, County Housing Authority. The aggregate face amount of
obligations to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $8,000,000.
‘(Z) A residential rental project is described
in this subparagraph if such project is a multifamily mixed-use housing
project located in a city described in paragraph (3)(C), the zoning
for which was changed to residential-business planned development
on November 26, 1985, and with respect to which both the city on December
4, 1985, and the state housing finance agency on December 20, 1985,
adopted inducement resolutions. The aggregate face amount of obligations
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $90,000,000.
‘(AA) A residential rental property project is
described in this subparagraph if it is the Carriage Trace residential
rental project in Clinton, Tennessee. The aggregate face amount of
bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(BB) A residential rental property project is
described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) a contract to purchase
such property was dated as of August 9, 1985,
‘(ii) there was an inducement
resolution adopted on September 27, 1985, for the issuance of obligations
to finance such property,
‘(iii) there was a State court
final validation of such financing on November 15, 1985, and
‘(iv) the certificate of nonappeal
from such validation was available on December 15, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $27,750,000.
‘(14) Qualified student loans. — The amendments
made by section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this
note) shall not apply to any qualified student loan bonds (as defined
in section 144 of the 1986 Code) issued by the Volunteer State Student
Assistance Corporation incorporated on February 20, 1985. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this paragraph applies shall not exceed
$130,000,000. In the case of bonds to which this paragraph applies,
the requirements of sections 148 and 149(d) of the 1986 Code shall
be treated as included in section 103 of the 1954 Code and shall apply
to such bonds.
‘(15) Annuity contracts. — The treatment
of annuity contracts as investment property under section 148(b)(2)
of the 1986 Code shall not apply to any bond described in any of the
following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A bond is described in this subparagraph if
such bond is issued by a city located in a noncontiguous State if —
‘(i) the authority to acquire
such a contract was approved on September 24, 1985, by city ordinance
A085-176, and
‘(ii) formal bid requests for
such contracts were mailed to insurance companies on September 6,
1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $57,000,000.
‘(B) A bond is described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) on or before May 12, 1985,
the governing board of the city pension fund authorized an agreement
with an underwriter to provide planning and financial guidance for
a possible bond issue, and
‘(ii) the proceeds of the sale
of such bond issue are to be used to purchase an annuity to fund the
unfunded liability of the City of Berkeley, California's Safety Members
Pension Fund.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $40,000,000.
‘(C) A bond is described in this subparagraph if
such bond is issued by the South Dakota Building Authority if on September
18, 1985, representatives of such authority and its underwriters met
with bond counsel and approved financing the purchase of an annuity
contract through the sale and leaseback of State properties. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $175,000,000.
‘(D) A bond is described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such bond is issued by
Los Angeles County, and
‘(ii) such county, before September
25, 1985, paid or incurred at least $50,000 of costs related to the
issuance of such bonds.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $500,000,000.
‘(16) Solid waste disposal facility. — The
amendments made by section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a)
of this note) shall not apply to any solid waste disposal facility
if —
‘(A) construction of such facility was approved
by State law I.C. 36-9-31,
‘(B) there was an inducement resolution on November
19, 1984, for the bonds with respect to such facility, and
‘(C) a carryforward election of unused 1984 volume
cap was made for such project on February 25, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $120,000,000.
‘(17) Refunding of bond anticipation notes. —
There shall not be taken into account under section 146 of the 1986
Code any refunding of bond anticipation notes —
‘(A) issued in December of 1984 by the Rhode Island
Housing and Mortgage Finance Corporation,
‘(B) which mature in December of 1986,
‘(C) which is not an advance refunding within the
meaning of section 149(d)(5) of the 1986 Code (determined by substituting
‘180 days’ for ‘90 days’ therein), and
‘(D) the aggregate face amount of the refunding
bonds does not exceed $25,500,000.
‘(18) Certain airports. — The amendments
made by section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this
note) shall not apply to a bond issued as part of an issue 95 percent
or more of the net proceeds of which are to be used to provide any
airport (within the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(D) of the 1954 Code)
if such airport is a mid-field airport terminal and accompanying facilities
at a major air carrier airport which during April 1980 opened a new
precision instrument approach runway 10R28L. The aggregate face amount
of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $425,000,000.
‘(19) Mass commuting facilities. — A bond
issued as a part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds
of which are to be used to provide a mass commuting facility (within
the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(D) of the 1954 Code) shall be treated
as an exempt facility bond (for facilities described in section 142(a)(3)
of the 1986 Code) for purposes of part IV of subchapter B of chapter
1 of the 1986 Code if such facility is described in 1 of the following
subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such facility provides
access to an international airport,
‘(ii) a corporation was formed
in connection with such project in September 1984,
‘(iii) the Board of Directors
of such corporation authorized the hiring of various firms to conduct
a feasibility study with respect to such project in April 1985, and
‘(iv) such feasibility study
was completed in November 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $150,000,000.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) enabling legislation with
respect to such project was approved by the State legislature in 1979,
‘(ii) a 1-percent local sales
tax assessment to be dedicated to the financing of such project was
approved by the voters on August 13, 1983, and
‘(iii) a capital fund with respect
to such project was established upon the issuance of $90,000,000 of
notes on October 22, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $200,000,000 and such bonds
must be issued before January 1, 1996.
‘(C) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) bonds issued therefor are
issued by or on behalf of an authority organized in 1979 pursuant
to enabling legislation originally enacted by the State legislature
in 1973, and
‘(ii) such facility is part
of a system connector described in a resolution adopted by the board
of directors of the authority on March 27, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $400,000,000. Notwithstanding
the last paragraph of this subsection, this subparagraph shall apply
to bonds issued before January 1, 1996.
‘(D) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the facility is a fixed
guideway project,
‘(ii) enabling legislation with
respect to the issuing authority was approved by the State legislature
in May 1973,
‘(iii) on October 28, 1985,
a board issued a request for consultants to conduct a feasibility
study on mass transit corridor analysis in connection with the facility,
and
‘(iv) on May 12, 1986, a board
approved a further binding contract for expenditures of approximately
$1,494,963, to be expended on a facility study.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $250,000,000. Notwithstanding
the last paragraph of this subsection, this subparagraph shall apply
to bonds issued before January 1, 1996.
‘(20) Private colleges. — Subsections (c)(2)
and (f) of section 148 of the 1986 Code shall not apply to any bond
which is issued as part of an issue if such bond —
‘(A) is issued by a political subdivision pursuant
to home rule and interlocal cooperation powers conferred by the constitution
and laws of a State to provide funds to finance the costs of the purchase
and construction of educational facilities for private colleges and
universities, and
‘(B) was the subject of a resolution of official
action by such political subdivision (Resolution No. 86-1039) adopted
by the governing body of such political subdivision on March 18, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $100,000,000.
‘(21) Pooled financing programs. —
‘(A) Section 147(b) of the 1986 Code shall not
apply to any hospital pooled financing program with respect to which –
‘(i) a formal presentation was
made to a city hospital facilities authority on January 14, 1986,
and
‘(ii) such authority passed
a resolution approving the bond issue in principle on February 5,
1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $95,000,000.
‘(B) Subsections (c)(2) and (f) of section 148
of the 1986 Code shall not apply to bonds for which closing occurred
on July 16, 1986, and for which a State municipal league served as
administrator for use in a State described in section 103A(g)(5)(C) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954. The aggregate face amount of obligations
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $585,000,000.
‘(22) Downtown redevelopment project. — Subsection
(b) of section 626 of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (section 626(b) of Pub. L. 98-369, set out as a note
under section 103 of this title) is amended by adding at the end thereof
the following new paragraph:
‘ ‘(7) Exception for certain downtown redevelopment
project. — The amendments made by this section shall not apply
to any obligation which is issued as part of an issue 95 percent or
more of the proceeds of which are to be used to provide a project
to acquire and redevelop a downtown area if —
‘ ‘(A) on August 15, 1985, a downtown redevelopment
authority adopted a resolution to issue obligations for such project,
‘ ‘(B) before September 26, 1985, the city expended,
or entered into binding contracts to expend, more than $10,000,000
in connection with such project, and
‘ ‘(C) the State supreme court issued a ruling
regarding the proposed financing structure for such project on December
11, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of obligations to which
this paragraph applies shall not exceed $85,000,000 and such obligations
must be issued before January 1, 1992.'
‘(23) Mass commuting and parking facilities. —
A bond issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds
of which are to be used to provide any mass commuting facility or
parking facility (within the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(D) of the
1954 Code) shall be treated as an exempt facility bond for purposes
of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code if such facility
is provided in connection with the rehabilitation, renovation, or
other improvement to an existing railroad station owned on the date
of the enactment of this Act (Oct. 22, 1986) by the National Railroad
Passenger Corporation in the Northeast Corridor and which was placed
in partial service in 1934 and was placed in the National Register
of Historic Places in 1978. The aggregate face amount of bonds to
which this paragraph applies shall not exceed $30,000,000.
‘(24) Tax-exempt status of bonds of certain educational
organizations. —
‘(A) In general. — For purposes of section
103 and part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code, a qualified
educational organization shall be treated as a governmental unit,
but only with respect to a trade or business carried on by such organization
which is not an unrelated trade or business (determined by applying
section 513(a) of such Code to such organization). The last paragraph
of this section shall not apply to the treatment under the preceding
sentence.
‘(B) Qualified educational organization. —
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term ‘qualified educational
organization’ means a college or university —
‘(i) which was reincorporated
and renewed with perpetual existence as a corporation by specific
act of the legislature of the State within which such college or university
is located on March 19, 1913, or
‘(ii) which —
‘(I) was initially incorporated
or created on February 28, 1787, on April 29, 1854, or on May 14,
1888, and
‘(II) as an instrumentality
of the State, serves as a ‘State-related’ university by a specific
act of the legislature of the State within which such college or university
is located.
‘(25) Tax-exempt status of bonds of certain public
utilities. —
‘(A) In general. — Except as provided in
subparagraph (B), a bond shall be treated as a qualified bond for
purposes of section 103 of the 1986 Code if such bond is issued after
the date of the enactment of this Act (Oct. 22, 1986) with respect
to a public utility facility if such facility is —
‘(i) located at any non-federally
owned dam (or on project waters or adjacent lands) located wholly
or partially in 1 or more of 3 counties, 2 of which are contiguous
to the third, where the rated capacity of the hydroelectric generating
facilities at 5 of such dams on October 18, 1979, was more than 650
megawatts each,
‘(ii) located at a dam (or on
the project waters or adjacent lands) at which hydroelectric generating
facilities were financed with the proceeds of tax-exempt obligations
before December 31, 1968,
‘(iii) owned and operated by
a State, political subdivision of a State, or any agency or instrumentality
of any of the foregoing, and
‘(iv) located at a dam (or on
project waters or adjacent lands) where the general public has access
for recreational purposes to such dam or to such project waters or
adjacent lands.
‘(B) Special rules for subparagraph (a). —
‘(i) Bonds subject to cap. —
Section 146 of the 1986 Code shall apply to any bond described in
subparagraph (A) which (without regard to subparagraph (A)) is a private
activity bond. For purposes of applying section 146(k) of the 1986
Code, the public utility facility described in subparagraph (A) shall
be treated as described in paragraph (2) of such section and such
paragraph shall be applied without regard to the requirement that
the issuer establish that a State's share of the use of a facility
(or its output) will equal or exceed the State's share of the private
activity bonds issued to finance the facility.
‘(ii) Limitation on amount of
bonds to which subparagraph (a) applies. — The aggregate face
amount of bonds to which subparagraph (A) applies shall not exceed
$750,000,000, not more than $350,000,000 of which may be issued before
January 1, 1992.
‘(iii) Limitation on purposes. —
Subparagraph (A) shall only apply to bonds issued as part of an issue
95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are used to provide
1 or more of the following:
‘(I) A fish by-pass facility
or fisheries enhancement facility.
‘(II) A recreational facility
or other improvement which is required by Federal licensing terms
and conditions or other Federal, State, or local law requirements.
‘(III) A project of repair,
maintenance, renewal, or replacement, and safety improvement.
‘(IV) Any reconstruction, replacement,
or improvement, including any safety improvement, which increases,
or allows an increase in, the capacity, efficiency, or productivity
of the existing generating equipment.
‘(26) Convention and parking facilities. —
A bond shall not be treated as a private activity bond for purposes
of section 103 and part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986
Code if —
‘(A) such bond is issued to provide a sports or
convention facility described in section 103(b)(4)(B) or (C) of the
1954 Code,
‘(B) such bond is not described in section 103(b)(2)
or (o)(2)(A) of such Code,
‘(C) legislation by a State legislature in connection
with such facility was enacted on July 19, 1985, and was designated
Chapter 375 of the Laws of 1985, and
‘(D) legislation by a State legislature in connection
with the appropriation of funds to a State public benefit corporation
for loans in connection with the construction of such facility was
enacted on April 17, 1985, and was designated Chapter 41 of the Laws
of 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $35,000,000.
‘(27) Small issue termination. — Section
144(a)(12) of the 1986 Code shall not apply to any bond issued as
part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are
to be used to provide a facility described in any of the following
subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) the facility is a hotel
and office facility located in a State capital,
‘(ii) the economic development
corporation of the city in which the facility is located adopted an
initial inducement resolution on October 30, 1985, and
‘(iii) a feasibility consultant
was retained on February 21, 1986, with respect to such facility.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility is financed by bonds issued by a State finance authority
which was created in April 1985 by Act 1062 of the State General Assembly,
and the Bond Guarantee Act (Act 505 of 1985) allowed such authority
to pledge the interest from investment of the State's general fund
as a guarantee for bonds issued by such authority. The aggregate face
amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed
$75,000,000.
‘(C) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility is a downtown mall and parking project for Holland,
Michigan, with respect to which an initial agreement was formulated
with the city in May 1985 and a formal memorandum of understanding
was executed on July 2, 1986. The aggregate face amount of bonds to
which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $18,200,000.
‘(D) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility is a downtown mall and parking ramp project for Traverse
City, Michigan, with respect to which a final development agreement
was signed in June 1986. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $21,500,000.
‘(E) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if such facility is the rehabilitation of the Heritage Hotel in Marquette,
Michigan. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $5,000,000.
‘(F) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is the Lakeland Center Hotel in Lakeland, Florida. The aggregate
face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph applies shall
not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(G) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is the Marble Arcade office building renovation project in Lakeland,
Florida. The aggregate face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $5,900,000.
‘(H) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is a medical office building in Bradenton, Florida, with respect
to which —
‘(i) a memorandum of agreement
was entered into on October 17, 1985, and
‘(ii) the city council held
a public hearing and approved issuance of the bonds on November 13,
1985.
The aggregate face amount of obligations to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $8,500,000.
‘(I) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if it consists of the rehabilitation of the Andover
Town Hall in Andover, Massachusetts. The provisions of section 149(b)
of the 1986 Code (relating to federally guaranteed obligations) shall
not apply to obligations to finance such project solely as a result
of the occupation of a portion of such building by a United States
Post Office. For purposes of determining whether any bond to which
this subparagraph applies is a qualified small issue bond, there shall
not be taken into account under section 144(a) of the 1986 Code capital
expenditures with respect to any facility of the United States Government
and there shall not be taken into account any bond allocable to the
United States Government.
‘(J) A facility is described
in this subparagraph if it is the Central Bank Building renovation
project in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The aggregate face amount of obligations
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $1,000,000.
‘(28) Certain private loans not taken into account. —
For purposes of determining whether any bond is a private activity
bond, an amount of loans (but not in excess of $75,000,000) provided
from the proceeds of 1 or more issues shall not be taken into account
if such loans are provided in furtherance of —
‘(A) a city Emergency Conservation Plan as set
forth in an ordinance adopted by the city council of such city on
February 17, 1983, or
‘(B) a resolution adopted by
the city council of such city on March 10, 1983, committing such city
to a goal of reducing the peak load of such city's electric generation
and distribution system by 553 megawatts in 15 years.
‘(29) Certain private business use not taken into
account. —
‘(A) The nonqualified amount
of the proceeds of an issue shall not be taken into account under
section 141(b)(5) of the 1986 Code or in determining whether a bond
described in subparagraph (B) (which is part of such issue) is a private
activity bond for purposes of section 103 and part IV of subchapter
B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code.
‘(B) A bond is described in this subparagraph if —
‘(i) such bond is issued before
January 1, 1993, by the State of Connecticut, and
‘(ii) such bond is issued pursuant
to a resolution of the State Bond Commission adopted before September
26, 1985.
‘(C) The nonqualified amount to which this paragraph
applies shall not exceed $150,000,000.
‘(D) For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘nonqualified
amount’ has the meaning given such term by section 141(b)(8) of the
1986 Code, except that such term shall include the amount of the proceeds
of an issue which is to be used (directly or indirectly) to make or
finance loans (other than loans described in section 141(c)(2) of
the 1986 Code) to persons other than governmental units.
‘(30) Volume cap not to apply to certain facilities. —
For purposes of section 146 of the 1986 Code, any exempt facility
bond for the following facility shall not be taken into account: The
facility is a facility for the furnishing of water which was authorized
under Public Law 90-537 (43 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) of the
United States if —
‘(A) construction of such facility began on May
6, 1973, and
‘(B) forward funding will be provided for the remainder
of the project pursuant to a negotiated agreement between State and
local water users and the Secretary of the Interior signed April 15,
1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $391,000,000.
‘(31) Certain hydroelectric generating property. —
A bond shall be treated as described in paragraph (2) of section 1316(f)
of this Act if -
‘(A) such bond would be so described but for the
substitution specified in such paragraph,
‘(B) on January 7, 1983, an application for a preliminary
permit was filed for the project for which such bond is issued and
received docket no. 6986, and
‘(C) on September 20, 1983, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission issued an order granting the preliminary permit
for the project.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $12,000,000.
‘(32) Volume cap. — The State ceiling applicable
under section 146 of the 1986 Code for calendar year 1987 for the
State which ratified the United States Constitution on May 29, 1790,
shall be $150,000,000 higher than the State ceiling otherwise applicable
under such section for such year.
‘(33) Application of $150,000,000 limitation for
certain qualified 501(c)(3) bonds. — Proceeds of an issue described
in any of the following subparagraphs shall not be taken into account
under section 145(b) of the 1986 Code.
‘(A) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) such proceeds are used
to provide medical school facilities or medical research and clinical
facilities for a university medical center,
‘(ii) such proceeds are of —
‘(I) a $21,550,000 issue dated
August 1, 1980,
‘(II) a $84,400,000 issue dated
September 1, 1984, and
‘(III) a $48,500,000 issue (Series
1985 A and 1985 B) dated on December 1, 1985, and
‘(iii) the issuer of all such
issues is the same.
‘(B) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if such proceeds are for use by Yale University and —
‘(i) the bonds are issued after
August 8, 1986, by the State of Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, or
‘(ii) the bonds are the 1st
or 2nd refundings (including advance refundings) of the bonds described
in clause (i) or of original bonds issued before August 7, 1986, by
such Authority.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $90,000,000.
‘(C) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) such issue is issued on
behalf of a university established by Charter granted by King George
II of England on October 31, 1754, to accomplish a refunding (including
an advance refunding) of bonds issued to finance 1 or more projects,
and
‘(ii) the application or other
request for the issuance of the issue to the appropriate State issuer
was made by or on behalf of such university before February 26, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $250,000,000.
‘(D) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) such proceeds are to be
used for finance construction of a new student recreation center,
‘(ii) a contract for the development
phase of the project was signed by the university on May 21, 1986,
with a private company for 5 percent of the costs of the project,
and
‘(iii) a committee of the university
board of administrators approved the major program elements for the
center on August 11, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $25,000,000.
‘(E) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) such proceeds are to be
used in the construction of new life sciences facilities for a university
for medical research and education,
‘(ii) the president of the university
authorized a faculty/administration planning committee for such facilities
on September 17, 1982,
‘(iii) the trustees of such
university authorized site and architect selection on October 30,
1984, and
‘(iv) the university negotiated
a $2,600,000 contract with the architect on August 9, 1985.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $47,500,000.
‘(F) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if such proceeds are to be used to renovate undergraduate
chemistry and engineering laboratories, and to rehabilitate other
basic science facilities, for an institution of higher education in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, chartered by legislative Acts of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, including an Act dated September 30, 1791. The aggregate
face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $6,500,000.
‘(G) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if such proceeds are of bonds which are the first advance
refunding of bonds issued during 1985 for the development of a computer
network, and construction and renovation or rehabilitation of other
facilities, for an institution of higher education described in subparagraph
(F). The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $80,000,000.
‘(H) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) the issue is issued on
behalf of a university founded in 1789, and
‘(ii) the proceeds of the issue
are to be used to finance projects (to be determined by such university
and the issuer) which are similar to those projects intended to be
financed by bonds that were the subject of a request transmitted to
Congress on November 7, 1985(.) The aggregate face amount of bonds
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $200,000,000.
Bonds to which this subparagraph applies shall be treated as qualified
501(c)(3) bonds if such bonds would not (if issued on August 15, 1986)
be industrial development bonds (as defined in section 103(b)(2) of
the 1954 Code), and section 147(f) of the 1986 Code shall not apply
to the issue of which such bonds are a part. Bonds issued to finance
facilities described in this subparagraph shall be treated as issued
to finance such facilities notwithstanding the fact that a period
in excess of 1 year has expired since the facilities were placed in
service.
‘(I) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if the issue is issued on behalf of a university established
on August 6, 1872, for a project approved by the trustees thereof
on November 1, 1985. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $100,000,000.
‘(J) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) the issue is issued on
behalf of a university for which the founding grant was signed on
November 11, 1885, and
‘(ii) such bond is issued for
the purpose of providing a Near West Campus Redevelopment Project
and a Student Housing Project.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $105,000,000.
‘(J) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) they are the proceeds of
advance refunding obligations issued on behalf of a university established
on April 21, 1831, and
‘(ii) the application or other
request for the issuance of such obligations was made to the appropriate
State issuer before July 12, 1986.
The aggregate face amount of obligations to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $175,000,000.
‘(K) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if
‘(i) the issue or issues are
for the purpose of financing or refinancing costs associated with
university facilities including at least 900 units of housing for
students, faculty, and staff in up to two buildings and an office
building containing up to 245,000 square feet of space, and
‘(ii) a bond act authorizing
the issuance of such bonds for such project was adopted on July 8,
1986, and such act under Federal law was required to be transmitted
to Congress.
The aggregate face amount of obligations to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $112,000,000.
‘(L) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if such issue is for Cornell University in an aggregate
face amount of not more than $150,000,000.
‘(M) Proceeds of an issue are described in this
subparagraph if such issue is issued on behalf of the Society of the
New York Hospital to finance completion of a project commenced by
such hospital in 1981 for construction of a diagnostic and treatment
center or to refund bonds issued on behalf of such hospital in connection
with the construction of such diagnostic and treatment center or to
finance construction and renovation projects associated with an inpatient
psychiatric care facility. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which
this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $150,000,000.
‘(N) Any bond to which section 145(b) of the 1986
Code does not apply by reason of this paragraph (other than subparagraph
(A) thereof) shall be taken into account in determining whether such
section applies to any later issue.
‘(O) In the case of any refunding bond —
‘(i) to which any subparagraph
of this paragraph applies, and
‘(ii) to which the last sentence
of section 1313(c)(2) applies, such bond shall be treated as having
such subparagraph apply (and the refunding bond shall be treated for
purposes of such section as issued before January 1, 1986, and as
not being an advance refunding) unless the issuer elects the opposite
result.
‘(34) Arbitrage rebate. — Section 148(f)
of the 1986 Code shall not apply to any period before October 1, 1990,
with respect to any bond the proceeds of which are to be used to provide
a high-speed rail system for the State of Ohio. The aggregate face
amount of bonds to which this paragraph applies shall not exceed $2,000,000,000.
‘(35) Extension of carryforward period. —
‘(A) In the case of a carryforward under section
103(n)(10) of the 1954 Code of $170,000,000 of bond limit for calendar
year 1984 for a project described in subparagraph (B), clause (i)
of section 103(n)(10)(C) of the 1954 Code shall be applied by substituting
‘6 calendar years’ for ‘3 calendar years’, and such carryforward may
be used by any authority designated by the State in which the facility
is located.
‘(B) A project is described in this subparagraph
if —
‘(i) such project is a facility
for local furnishing of electricity described in section 645 of the
Tax Reform Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-369,
div. A, title VI, Sec. 645, July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 940), and
‘(ii) construction of such facility
commenced within the 3-year period following the calendar year in
which the carryforward arose.
‘(36) Power purchase bonds. — A bond issued
to finance purchase of power from a power facility at a dam being
renovated pursuant to P.L. 98-381 (43 U.S.C. 619 et seq.) shall not
be treated as a private activity bond if it would not be such under
section 141(b)(1) and (2) of the 1986 Code if 25 percent were substituted
for 10 percent and the provisions of section 141(b)(3), (4), and (5)
of the 1986 Code did not apply. The aggregate face amount of bonds
to which this paragraph applies shall not exceed $400,000,000.
‘(37) Qualified mortgage bonds. — A bond
issued as part of either of 2 issues no later than September 8, 1986,
shall be treated as a qualified mortgage bond within the meaning of
section 141(d)(1)(B) of the 1986 Code if it satisfies the requirements
of section 103A of the 1954 Code and if the issues are issued by the
two most populous cities in the Tar Heel State. The aggregate face
amount of bonds to which this paragraph applies shall not exceed $4,000,000.
‘(38) Exempt facility bonds. — A bond shall
be treated as an exempt facility bond within the meaning of section
142(a) of the 1986 Code if it is issued to fund residential, office,
retail, light industrial, recreational and parking development known
as Tobacco Row. Such bond shall be subject to section 146 of the 1986
Code. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this paragraph applies
shall not exceed $100,000,000.
‘(39) Certain bonds treated as qualified 501(c)(3)
bonds. — A bond issued as part of an issue shall be treated
for purposes of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code
as a qualified 501(c)(3) bond if —
‘(A) such bond would not (if issued on August 15,
1986) be an industrial development bond (as defined in section 103(b)(2)
of the 1954 Code), and
‘(B) such issue was approved by city voters on
January 19, 1985, for construction or renovation of facilities for
the cultural and performing arts.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $5,000,000.
‘(40) Certain library bonds. — In the case
of a bond issued before January 1, 1986, by the City of Los Angeles
Community Redevelopment Agency to provide the library and related
structures associated with the City of Los Angeles Central Library
Project, the ownership and use of the land and facilities associated
with such project by persons which are not governmental units (or
payments from such persons) shall not adversely affect the exclusion
from gross income under section 103 of the 1954 Code of interest on
such bonds.
‘(41) Certain refunding obligations for certain
power facilities. — With respect to 2 net billed nuclear power
facilities located in the State of Washington on which construction
has been suspended, the requirements of section 147(b) of the 1986
Code shall be treated as satisfied with respect to refunding bonds
issued before 1992 if —
‘(A) each refunding bond has a maturity date not
later than the maturity date of the refunded bond, and
‘(B) the facilities have not been placed in service
as of the date of issuance of the refunding bond.
The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
paragraph applies shall not exceed $2,000,000,000. Section 146 of
the 1986 Code and the last paragraph of this section shall not apply
to bonds to which this paragraph applies.
‘(42) Residential rental property. — A bond
issued to finance a residential rental project within the meaning
of 103(b)(4) of the 1954 Code shall be treated as an exempt facility
bond within the meaning of section 142(a)(7) of the 1986 Code if the
county housing finance authority adopted an inducement resolution
with respect to the project on May 8, 1985, and the project is located
in Polk County, Florida. The aggregate face amount of bonds to which
this paragraph applies shall not exceed $4,100,000.
‘(43) Extension of advance refunding for certain
facilities. — Paragraph (4) of section 631(c) of the Tax Reform
Act of 1984 (section 631(c)(4) of Pub.
L. 98-369, set out as a note under section 103 of
this title) is amended —
‘(A) by striking out the second sentence thereof,
‘(B) by adding at the end thereof the following
new sentence: ‘In the case of refunding obligations not exceeding
$100,000,000 issued by the Alabama State Docks Department, the first
sentence of this paragraph shall be applied by substituting ‘December
31, 1987’ for ‘December 31, 1984’.'
‘(44) Pool bonds. — The following amounts
of pool bonds are exempt from the arbitrage rebate requirement of
section 148(f) of the 1986 Code and the temporary period limitation
of section 148(c)(2) of the 1986 Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximum Bond Pool Amount Tennessee Utility Districts Pool $80,000,000 New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council $35,000,000 Pennsylvania Local Government Investment Trust Pool $375,000,000 Indiana Bond Bank Pool $240,000,000 Hernando County, Florida Bond Pool $300,000,000 Utah Municipal Finance Cooperative Pool $262,000,000 North Carolina League of Municipalities Pool $200,000,000 Kentucky Municipal League Bond Pool $170,000,000 Kentucky Association of Counties Bond Pool $200,000,000 Homewood Municipal Bond Pool $50,000,000 Colorado Association of School Boards Pool $300,000,000 Tennessee Municipal League Pooled Bonds $75,000,000 Georgia Municipal Association Pool $130,000,000 -------------------------------
‘(45) Certain carryforward elections. — Notwithstanding
any other provision of this title (enacting sections 141 to 150 and
7703 of this title, amending sections 2, 22, 25, 32, 86, 103, 105,
152, 153, 163, 172, 194, 269A, 414, 879, 1016, 1398, 3402, 4701, 4940,
4942, 4988, 6362, 6652, and 7871 of this title, repealing sections
103A, 1391 to 1397, and 6039B of this title, omitting former section
143 of this title, enacting provisions set out as notes under sections
141, 148, and 501 of this title, and amending provisions set out as
a note under section 103A of this title) —
‘(A) In the case of a metropolitan service district
created pursuant to State revised statutes, chapter 268, up to $100,000,000
unused 1985 bond authority may be carried forward to any year until
1989 (regardless of the date on which such carryforward election is
made).
‘(B) If —
‘(i) official action was taken
by an industrial development board on September 16, 1985, with respect
to the issuance of not more than $98,500,000, of waste water treatment
revenue bonds, and
‘(ii) an executive order of
the governor granted a carryforward of State bond authority for such
project on December 30, 1985, such carryforward election shall be
valid for any year through 1988. The aggregate face amount of obligations
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $98,500,000.
‘(46) Treatment of certain obligations to finance
hydroelectric generating facility. — If —
‘(A) obligations are issued in an amount not exceeding
$5,000,000 to finance the construction of a hydroelectric generating
facility located on the North Fork of Cache Creek in Lake County,
California, which was the subject of a preliminary resolution of the
issuer of the obligations on June 29, 1982, or are issued to refund
any of such obligations,
‘(B) substantially all of the electrical power
generated by such facility is to be sold to a nongovernmental person
pursuant to a long-term power sales agreement in accordance with the
Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-617, see Short Title note
set out under 16 U.S.C. 2601),
and
‘(C) the initially issued obligations are issued
on or before December 31, 1986, and any of such refunding obligations
are issued on or before December 31, 1996, then the person referred
to in subparagraph (B) shall not be treated as a principal user of
such facilities by reason of such sales for purposes of subparagraphs
(D) and (E) of section 103(b)(6) of the 1954 Code.
‘(47) Treatment of certain obligations to finance
steam and electric cogeneration facility. — If —
‘(A) obligations are issued on or before December
31, 1986, in an amount not exceeding $4,400,000 to finance a facility
for the generation and transmission of steam and electricity having
a maximum electrical capacity of approximately 5.3 megawatts and located
within the City of San Jose, California, or are issued to refund any
of such obligations,
‘(B) substantially all of the electrical power
generated by such facility that is not sold to an institution of higher
education created by statute of the State of California is to be sold
to a nongovernmental person pursuant to a long-term power sales agreement
in accordance with the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978
(Pub. L. 95-617, see
Short Title note set out under 16
U.S.C. 2601), and
‘(C) the initially issued obligations are issued
on or before December 31, 1986, and any of such refunding obligations
are issued on or before December 31, 1996, then the nongovernmental
person referred to in subparagraph (B) shall not be treated as a principal
user of such facilities by reason of such sales for purposes of subparagraphs
(D) and (E) of section 103(b)(6)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
‘(48) Treatment of certain obligations. —
A bond which is not an industrial development bond under section 103(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954 shall not be treated as a private activity bond for purposes
of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 1986 Code if 95 percent
or more of the net proceeds of the issue of which such bond is a part
are used to provide facilities described in any of the following subparagraphs:
‘(A) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is a governmentally-owned and operated State fair and exposition
center with respect to which —
‘(i) the 1985 session of the
State legislature authorized revenue bonds to be issued in a maximum
amount of $10,000,000, and
‘(ii) a market feasibility study
dated June 30, 1986, relating to a major capital improvemental program
at the facility was prepared for the advisory board of the State fair
and exposition center by a certified public accounting firm. The aggregate
face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph applies shall
not exceed $10,000,000.
‘(B) A facility is described in this subparagraph
if it is a convention, trade, or spectator facility which is to be
located in the State with respect to which paragraph (6)(U) applies
and with respect to which feasibility and preliminary design consultants
were hired on May 1, 1985 and October 31, 1985. The aggregate face
amount of obligations to which this subparagraph applies shall not
exceed $175,000,000.
‘(C) A facility which is part of a project described
in paragraph (6)(O). The aggregate face amount of bonds to which this
subparagraph applies shall not exceed $20,000,000.
‘(49) Transition rule for refunding certain housing
bonds. — Sections 146 and 149(d)(2) of the 1986 Code shall not
apply to the refunding of any bond issued under section 11(b) of the
United States Housing Act of 1937 (42
U.S.C. 1437i(b)) before December 31, 1983, if —
‘(A) the bond has an original term to maturity
of at least 40 years,
‘(B) the maturity date of the refunding bonds does
not exceed the maturity date of the refunded bonds,
‘(C) the amount of the refunding bonds does not
exceed the outstanding amount of the refunded bonds,
‘(D) the interest rate on the refunding bonds is
lower than the interest rate of the refunded bonds, and
‘(E) the refunded bond is required to be redeemed
not later than the earliest date on which such bond could be redeemed
at par.
‘(50) Transitioned bonds subject to certain rules. —
In the case of any bond to which any provision of this section applies,
except as otherwise expressly provided, sections 103 and 103A of the
1954 Code shall be applied as if the requirements of sections 147(g),
148, and 149(d) of the 1986 Code were included in each such section.
‘(51) Certain additional projects. — Section
141(b) of the 1986 Code shall be applied by substituting ‘25’ for
‘10’ each place it appears and by not applying sections 141(b)(3)
and 141(c)(1)(B) to bonds substantially all of the proceeds are used
for —
‘(A) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it consists of a capital improvements program for a metropolitan
sewer district, with respect to which a proposition was submitted
to voters on August 7, 1984. The aggregate face amount of obligations
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $60,000,000.
‘(B) Facilities described in this subparagraph
if it consists of additions, extensions, and improvements to the wastewater
system for Lakeland, Florida. The aggregate face amount of obligations
to which this subparagraph applies shall not exceed $20,000,000.
‘(C) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is the Central Valley Water Reclamation Project in Utah. The
aggregate face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph applies
shall not exceed $100,000,000.
‘(D) A project is described in this subparagraph
if it is a project to construct approximately 26 miles of toll expressways,
with respect to which any appeal to validation was filed July 11,
1986. The aggregate face amount of obligations to which this subparagraph
applies shall not exceed $450,000,000.
‘(52) Termination. — Except as otherwise
provided in this section, this section shall not apply to any bond
issued after December 31, 1990.
‘SEC. 1318. DEFINITIONS, ETC., RELATING TO EFFECTIVE
DATES AND TRANSITIONAL RULES.
‘(a) Definitions. — For purposes of this
subtitle -
‘(1) 1954 code. — The
term ‘1954 Code’ means the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as in effect
on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act (Oct. 22,
1986).
‘(2) 1986 code. — The
term ‘1986 Code’ means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended
by this Act (see Tables for classification).
‘(3) Bond. – The term ‘bond’ includes any
obligation.
‘(4) Advance refund. —
A bond shall be treated as issued to advance refund another bond if
it is issued more than 90 days before the redemption of the refunded
bond.
‘(5) Net proceeds. — The
term ‘net proceeds’ has the meaning given such term by section 150(a)
of the 1986 Code.
‘(6) Continued application of
the 1954 code. — Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed
to exempt any bond from any provision of the 1954 Code by reason of
a delay in (or exemption from) the application of any amendment made
by subtitle A (sections 1301 to 1303 of Pub.
L. 99-514, enacting sections 141 to 150 and 7703
of this title, amending sections 2, 22, 25, 32, 86, 103, 105, 152,
153, 163, 172, 194, 269A, 414, 879, 1016, 1398, 3402, 4701, 4940,
4942, 4988, 6362, 6652, and 7871 of this title, repealing sections
103A, 1391 to 1397, and 6039B of this title, omitting former section
143 of this title, enacting provisions set out as notes under sections
141, 148, and 501 of this title, and amending provisions set out as
a note under section 103A of this title).
‘(7) Treatment as exempt facility. —
Any bond which is treated as an exempt facility bond by section 1316
or 1317 shall not fail to be so treated by reason of subsection (b)
of section 142 of the 1986 Code.
‘(8) Application of future legislation
to transitioned bonds. — In the case of any bond to which the
amendments made by section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a)
of this note) do not apply by reason of a provision of this Act (see
Tables for classification), any amendment of the 1986 Code (and any
other provision applicable to such Code) included in any law enacted
after October 22, 1986, shall be treated as included in section 103
and section 103A (as appropriate) of the 1954 Code with respect to
such bond unless —
‘(A) such law expressly provides
that such amendment (or other provision) shall not apply to such bond,
or
‘(B) such amendment (or other
provision) applies to a provision of the 1986 Code -
‘(i) for which there is no corresponding
provision in section 103 and section 103A (as appropriate) of the
1954 Code, and
‘(ii) which is not otherwise
treated as included in such sections 103 and 103A with respect to
such bond.
‘(b) Minimum Tax Treatment. —
‘(1) In general. — Any
bond described in paragraph (2) shall not be treated as a private
activity bond for purposes of section 57 of the 1986 Code unless such
bond would (if issued on August 7, 1986) be -
‘(A) an industrial development
bond (as defined in section 103(b)(2) of the 1954 Code), or
‘(B) a private loan bond (as
defined in section 103(o)(2)(A) of the 1954 Code, without regard to
any exception from such definition other than section 103(o)(2)(C)
of such Code).
‘(2) Bonds described. —
For purposes of paragraph (1), a bond is described in this paragraph
if —
‘(A) the amendments made by
section 1301 (for classification see section 1311(a) of this note)
do not apply to such bond by reason of section 1312 or 1316(g),
‘(B) any provision of section
1317 applies to such bond, or
‘(C) the proceeds of such bond
are used to refund any bond referred to in subparagraph (A) or (B)
(or any bond which is part of a series of refundings of such a bond)
if the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection
(c) are met with respect to the refunding bond.
‘(c) Current Refundings Not Taken Into Account
in Applying Aggregate Limit on Bonds to Which Transitional Rules Apply. —
The limitation on the aggregate face amount of bonds to which any
provision of section 1316(g) or 1317 applies shall not be reduced
by the face amount of any bond the proceeds of which are to be used
exclusively to refund any bond to which such provision applies (or
any bond which is part of a series of refundings of such bond) if —
‘(1) the average maturity date
of the issue of which the refunding bond is a part is not later than
the average maturity date of the bonds to be refunded by such issue,
‘(2) the amount of the refunding
bond does not exceed the outstanding amount of the refunded bond,
and
‘(3) the net proceeds of the
refunding bond are used to redeem the refunded bond not later than
90 days after the date of the issuance of the refunding bond. For
purposes of paragraph (1), average maturity shall be determined in
accordance with section 147(b)(2)(A) of the 1986 Code. No limitation
in section 1316(g) or 1317 on the period during which bonds may be
issued under such section shall apply to any refunding bond which
meets the requirements of this subsection.
‘(d) Special Rule Permitting Carryforward of Volume
Cap for Certain Transitioned Projects. — A bond to which section
1312 or 1317 applies shall be treated as having a carryforward purpose
described in section 146(f)(5) of the 1986 Code, and the requirement
of section 146(f)(2)(A) of the 1986 Code shall be treated as met if
such project is identified with reasonable specificity. The preceding
sentence shall not apply so as to permit a carryforward with respect
to any qualified small issue bond.’
(Section 1013(c)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 100-647 provided that: ‘The
amendment made by subparagraph (A) (amending section 1313(a)(3)(C)
of Pub. L. 99-514,
set out above) shall apply to bonds issued after June 30, 1987'.)
(Section 1013(c)(11)(E) of Pub. L. 100-647 provided that: ‘A
refunding bond issued before July 1, 1987, shall be treated as meeting
the requirement of subparagraph (A) of section 1313(c)(1) of the Reform
Act (Pub. L. 99-514,
set out above) if such bond met the requirement of such subparagraph
as in effect before the amendments made by this paragraph (amending
section 1313(c) of Pub. L. 99-514,
set out above).')
(Section 1013(c)(14)(B) of Pub. L. 100-647 provided that: ‘The
amendment made by subparagraph (A) (amending section 1313 of Pub. L. 99-514, set out above) shall
apply with respect to refunding bonds issued after October 16, 1987.')
(Section 1013(e)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 100-647 provided that: ‘The
amendment made by subparagraph (A) (amending section 1315(e) of Pub. L. 99-514, set out above) shall
apply to bonds issued after June 10, 1987.')
(Section 1013(f)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 100-647 provided that: ‘The
amendment made by subparagraph (A) (amending section 1316 of Pub. L. 99-514, set out above) shall
apply only with respect to carryforwards of volume cap for years after
1986.')
(Section 1013(f)(7)(B) of Pub. L. 100-647 provided that: ‘The
amendment made by subparagraph (A) (amending section 1316(g)(8) of Pub. L. 99-514, set out above) shall
apply only with respect to carryforwards of volume cap for years after
1986.')
APPLICATION OF SECURITY INTEREST TEST TO BOND
FINANCING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES
Section 6179 of Pub.
L. 100-647 provided that: ‘Before January 1, 1989,
the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate shall issue guidance
concerning the application of the private security or payment test
under section 141(b)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 to tax-exempt bond financing by State
and local governments of hazardous waste clean-up activities conducted
by such governments where some of the activities occur on privately
owned land.'
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERIES MODIFICATIONS
Section 1301(d) of Pub.
L. 99-514 provided that: ‘Notwithstanding any other
provision of law or any regulations promulgated thereunder (including
the provisions of 31 CFR part 344)
the Secretary of the Treasury shall extend by January 1, 1987, the
State and Local Government Series program to provide -
‘(1) instruments allowing flexible
investment of bond proceeds in a manner eliminating the earning of
rebatable arbitrage,
‘(2) demand deposits under such
program by eliminating advance notice and minimum maturity requirements
related to the purchase of bonds,
‘(3) operation of such program
at no net cost to the Federal Government, and
‘(4) deposits for a stated maturity
under reasonable advance notice requirements.’
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS
Section 1301(e) of Pub.
L. 99-514 provided that: ‘The Secretary of the Treasury
or his delegate shall modify the Secretary's advance ruling guidelines
relating to when use of property pursuant to a management contract
is not considered a trade or business use by a private person for
purposes of section 141(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that use pursuant to a
management contract generally shall not be treated as trade or business
use as long as -
‘(1) the term of such contract
(including renewal options) does not exceed 5 years,
‘(2) the exempt owner has the
option to cancel such contract at the end of any 3-year period,
‘(3) the manager under the contract
is not compensated (in whole or in part) on the basis of a share of
net profits, and
‘(4) at least 50 percent of
the annual compensation of the manager under such contract is based
on a periodic fixed fee.’
AMENDMENT TO OUTPUT REGULATIONS
Section 1301(i) of Pub.
L. 99-514 provided that: ‘The Secretary of the Treasury
or his delegate shall amend the provision in the Federal income tax
regulations relating to when use pursuant to certain output contracts
is considered to satisfy the private business tests of paragraphs
(1) and (2) of section 141(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the requirement
of a 3 percent guaranteed minimum payment.'
PRIOR
PROVISIONS
A
prior section 141, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 40; Feb.
26, 1964, Pub. L. 88-272,
title I, Sec. 112(a), 78 Stat. 23; Dec. 30, 1969, Pub. L. 91-172, title VIII, Sec.
802(a), (c)(4), (e), 83 Stat. 676, 678; Dec. 10, 1971, Pub. L. 92-178, title II, Sec. 202,
203(a)-(c), title III, Sec. 301(a), 85 Stat. 511, 520; Mar. 29, 1975, Pub. L. 94-12, title II, Sec. 201(a),
202(a), 89 Stat. 28, 29; Dec. 23, 1975, Pub. L. 94-164, Sec. 2(a)(1),
(b)(1), 89 Stat. 970, 971; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub.
L. 94-455, title IV, Sec. 401(b)(1), (2), title XIX,
Sec. 1906(b)(13)(A), 90 Stat. 1556, 1834, which provided for the standard
deduction, was repealed by Pub. L. 95-30,
title I, Sec. 101(d)(1), May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 133, applicable to
taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976.